Go find another resume to be critical about. Like JCC sr. or DLH.. What is that, oh you don't hate them? o.k. homie take care.
I alreday have, and I found out that their resumes are still better than Pac's. You don't believe me, I challenge you to a debate. :hey
Who did you pick on Oscar vs Pac again? You have no room to talk whatsoever, nada. You proved yourself incompetent on the subject.
I picked ODLH. Not a big deal. How the **** was anyone to know he was weight drained as ****??? Hell, Roach didn't know how severe it was untill he saw the IV marks on his arm. So Pac beat a shot, weight drained fighter. :roll:
No sense in debating a hater... You'll just enforce your opinion that everyone Manny has fought was shot. Including if he beats Cotto, Marquez beat him 2x, etc, etc. While DLH really won against whitaker, and robbed against trinidad; how JCC was prime, Hopkins was too big, he was shot against Floyd, Felix S. really lost, Mosley was on roids, etc. etc. and Chavez the same thing. You can't argue with a hater. I know how all you haters think. Credit to your fighters and discredit the ones you hate.
I don't think that Pac is hated by a lot of people (with the exception of a few Mexicans). he is a humble guy with a style very difficult to beat, he has a great resume and has won against many great fighters against all odds.
What great fighters against what odds? Not saying it isn't there, but again, I ask, What great fighters against what odds? Vegas odds??
ULiUli YOU are a certified hater and you are denying it?! Wether you find 1001 boxers who has a better resume or not does not change the fact you are a hater
The questions of a hater. What ever you interpret it to be. In your case it is shot fighters right, it doesn't make it fact but to a hater it is. Vegas odds don't reflect any risk that Manny took because he is a *****. Pac never fought any great fighters right??? Just shot ones. Im helping you out here.