Marvin Hagler - Is He Becoming Underrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Oct 28, 2009.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,265
    8,857
    Jul 17, 2009
    Too right. As good as Calzaghe was,he was n't in Marvin's class.
     
  2. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    just something i read the other day thought it would be off interest in this thread
     
  3. Rubber Warrior

    Rubber Warrior Resident ESB Soothsayer Full Member

    912
    1
    Jul 19, 2004
    There is a flaw to that theory. The Hopkins that disassembled Glen Johnson would box well with the best variant of Hagler. Add to that, Hagler demonstrated that others could get into his head. Both Duran and Leonard accomplished this.

    Trust that the verbose and confident Hopkins would find a way to climb into Marv's head - and that Hops had the drive, will and talent to make it damned close.

    :good
     
  4. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    33
    Jan 4, 2009
    Yeh, it was all about what went on in Marvin's head was'nt it, the blue coller chip on the shoulder, he'd **** himself off if he did'nt have one on each shoulder, he used to use that to his advantage but it always worked against him when it mattered as in Duran/Leonard by playing the aggrieved dis-respected champ.

    Without doubt Hopkins would have got at Marvin & in a big way, talk about looking in the mirror, i'd take Marvin to win on points but it would'nt be pretty & B-Hop would have more than his fair share of moments, close fight over 12/15 regardless.
     
  5. Raging B(_)LL

    Raging B(_)LL KAPOW!!! Full Member

    2,675
    47
    Jul 19, 2004
    Some folks underrate him, some overrate him, and some both underrate and overrate him at times, hows that for an answer?

    :smoke
     
  6. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    when youve got carl froch saying that he would beat him, you know his great ability has been forgotten about by the stupid few
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    I hardly think that Hagler is becoming underrated..he polls rather well near the top of the middleweight rankings when the "best ever" at that weight is discussed, however I'm always leery of revisionism wherever and whenever it pops up it's nasty head. I myself believe he would have encountered a "bridge too far" in Monzon, but to me that's no disgrace. I put Hagler at #2 in the alltime middleweight rankings.
     
  8. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    31
    Mar 10, 2007
    many fancy him over srr on this board
     
  9. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    174
    Jul 23, 2004
    Froch is way too open for someone like Hagler. He must be smoking something if he thinks he would've beaten Marvin.

    :rastaFroch.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Not sure if he's underrated, most people seem to have him near the top of their middleweight rankings, but I think I rate him higher than a lot of other people do. I had him beating Vito and Duran comfortably and thought he edged out Ray too, so, he was quite a dominant figure all things considered for me.

    James Toney should not be mentioned in the same breath as Marvin Hagler so far as middleweights go. He was struggling to beat guys like Reggie Johnson, Michael Nunn and an old Mike McCallum at his peak, guys Hagler would have easily handled in peak form.
     
  11. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Why shouldn't Hopkins get mentioned in the same breath?
     
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    I thought that, all those flashy, shoe shine flurries of Leonard were offset by the more telling, and honest work and determination of Hagler, who finally got his groove and finished better than he started. I think Hagler barely eked it out, and deserved the decision, and certainly noting worse than a draw. The scoring was less than educated by the judges.
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,562
    Jul 28, 2004
    Froch would have suffered a Sibsonlike beating from Hagler or worse, and Arthur would have been subjected to the same kind of abuse as Roldan before exiting via a stoppage in the 8th or 9th.
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    174
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hagler hardly put two punches together. While Leonard was throwing combinations that were more designed to simply score, he did hit Hagler with some clean power punches. Ok, they never had an effect on the durable Hagler but he did catch him with some good power punches at times throughout the fight.

    If ever there was a moment during the fight that summed up Hagler's showing overall, it was the 9th round. He had Leonard hurt a bit on the ropes yet looked slow when having a stationary target in front of him who was there for the taking. His punches were predictable and ponderous. It was perhaps Hagler's most impressive patch of the fight, yet he looked terrible. His timing was off and he lacked the speed that he possessed in his prime or even the Hearns fight 2 years earlier.
     
  15. walker smith

    walker smith New Member Full Member

    47
    20
    Jul 11, 2018
    hagler was great at slipping punches and lookin them off . people always seem to forget that ..also one of the best ever at closing the distance and superb infighter