You're correct on all three counts IMO. There isn't even a good argument for having Ali above Charles or Louis above Fitzsimmons. Langford or Robinson is a toss-up, but I like Langford's resume and weight-jumping a little bit more.
Yeah, basically every other list in the thread had exactly the same relative placements. He probably picked on mine because I didn't like his.
I think it does. If it comes to the choice between a single-weight division dominator or a multi-weight champ, I usually sway towards the latter. It's fair enough if someone maybe felt they didn't have the physical frame for it, but a great fighter should still have the "mental frame" for the challenge. Many ATG fighters didn't (Pep, Monzon, Hagler, etc), and that's why they lost extremely close battles for placings with guys like Barney Ross and SRL in my rankings. Even if someone has a very strong resume at their weight, I always think that wins acquired against bigger men are just that bit more impressive, so a multi-weight resume edges a single-weight resume (obviously these rules don't impinge upon heavyweight ratings). JMHO.
I think #12 is OK for Pep, but I wouldn't care to see him much lower. He's a lock for the 14, I think. He does have some decent lightweights, just for saying.
well Pep had challenges in the Featherweight division in top contenders and he fought heavier guys in non title fights regulary. I can undertand a win over a bigger guy is better but i would prefer say Monzons domination over the MWs to Jones Jrs more selective weight jumping
I am stating that men who did fight bigger men proved they had the steel for it, whereas men who never jumped weight may well have been capable of it but obviously cannot be given credit for it, thus I tend to sway towards the weight-jumpers whenever there is a close call. Look at my rating of Monzon though, it is clear I rate him extremely highly. If I had Michael Spinks or Bob Foster above me, I doubt I'd have been straining at the leash to move up either.
I only go with the weight-jumper in a close call usually. I'm not saying weight-jumpers are uniformly better. I have Monzon in my top 20, I don't have Jones. I rate Hagler far, far higher than I do De La Hoya or Mayweather.
Well, you mention having a "mental frame" for moving up, implying that those who didn't do so probably lack it. That's the point I took umbrage with. Some could imply that moving up in weight is more a sign of avoiding somebody left behind in weight, moreso than a desire to test themselves against bigger competition. It's a two sided sword.
1. SRR 2. Henry Armstrong 3. Ezzard Charles 4. Duran 5. Pep 6. Benny Leonard 7. Ali 8. Fitzsimmons 9. Greb 10. Archie Moore 11. Mickey Walker 12. SRL 13. Barney Ross 14. Sandy Saddler 15. Joe Louis 16. Sam Langford 17. Carlos Monzon 18. Alexis Arguello 19. Pernell Whittaker 20. Jose Napoles