A one dimensional style is very hard to have sustained success in championship boxing, yet there have been fighters who have become very successful using it. Who was the best with the least amount of dimension to their game?
Nigel Benn is a decent shout. He had no idea how to box, only how to throw hard shots and more often than not it paid off for him. When he came against fighters who could take his shot though, he came up short.
Most dominant fighters are what is often called a complete fighter. They can match up against all styles, meaning they can box, move, brawl, fight inside, outside, etc. Im interested to hear other peoples view. David Tua would be a perfect example of a guy who is one dimensional, he had little dimension to his game other than coming forward and brawling. Systematically there can be perfections of a style like this, and there are fighters throughout history that were able to be very successful against other fighters, complete or otherwise using it.
Marciano.Truly the best unskilled toiler of all time. Sung-kil moon Khaosai Galaxy Don't agree with Benn, he was beter when he used the full range of his skills.
:yep Marciano tops the list. I was wondering if Peet would post that since hes in his avatar. I also dont think Benn was horribly one dimensional, but he was somewhat. He wasnt the prettiest boxer.
Benn could fight as more of a boxer-puncher\educated pressure fighter when he opted to.He wasn't a guy with no idea how to box, walking forward just winging punches because he had no alternative.That would better describe someone like Moon.Benn was more of a hybrid. Watch his supermiddle fights(especiallyEubank rematch) or stuff like the Sanderline Williams or even first Eubank fight to an extent.He could work a very good stiff jab, pick punches quite well and use an educated bob and weave defence. and then go all out slugger when the openings were there. I think he was better when he fought more intelligently than when he did the one-dimensional go for broke thing..The Watson fight was not the image of someone who has perfected that way of fighting.
You can say Marciano was unskilled, but only if you mean it as relative to Jose Napoles. You cannot imply that Benn was significantly more skilled than Marciano.
It depends what you mean by one-dimensional. In specific terms, I'd hesitate to call any top level fighter one-dimensional. Generally speaking however, I find that In-Jin Chi springs to mind for some reason, although he isn't an ATG. At his peak, however, he was a physical brute; limited in terms of skill but with a relentless, windmilling approach and an iron jaw. I really enjoyed watching him.