Scarier Foreman or Tyson Hitting the Heavybag

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by juanitoboxing, Nov 1, 2009.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,508
    10,383
    Jun 23, 2008
    If that you were the case... he woulda KO'd Morrison and Briggs w/no problem. Foreman CLEARLY didnt hit as hard in the 90's as he did in the 70's. Probably because he lost the velocity on his punches that he had in the 70's, and the snap.
     
  2. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says . . .

    Tyson.... seeing a big guy move so fast and can kill...... Foreman was huge and of course powerful... but the speed is what gets me...
     
  3. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    I believe that was a water bag Tyson was hitting. Speed and power, but Foreman was much more powerful. Foreman will absolutely catch Tyson sooner or later. You can't say they can go 12 or 15 rounds and Tyson is going to go circles around Foreman. Frazier was fast and looked what happened to him.
     
  4. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008

    Your right, but then again Foreman was lighter and more agile back in the 70's. Fighters in the 90's looked at Foreman like **** that old guy can't hit that hard. As Moorer found out. You have to outbox him like Morrison or you will be put to sleep.
     
  5. Quitali Bitchko

    Quitali Bitchko The Punisher Full Member

    476
    2
    Sep 28, 2009
    Bull****! And Tyson and Fraizer are two very different things. And we are not disscusing a Foreman-Tyson fantasy match up here. And you say Fraizer was fast?! Well compared to Tyson he was a turtle!