Klitschko fan, quote of the week!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Fighting Weight, Nov 3, 2009.


  1. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    "Roach is wrong here. Every time they fight they take risks. Ali, Holmes, Tyson, Frazier, Holyfield etc all wish they could have dominated in the manner the Klitschkos dominate"

    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    God bless Freddie Roach for stirring up the hornets nest on this one.
     
  2. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    not bad but...

    I think every fighter would love to dominate their opponents every round, take no damage and get the stoppage. it's a valid point. although many of these fighters did just that during their absolute peak.

    Poster just took it a bit too far.
     
  3. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008
    I've heard worse
     
  4. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    Klit fans do not seem to realise that neither brother has ever been legit champ in the same way that the these guys were.

    Neither ever will be.
     
  5. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    That's entirely the point my friend....people think I'm laughing at comparisons but the most amusing thing about the post is the fact that neither one of them has ever been undisputed champion, so calling them dominant is bull****.
     
  6. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    They call for people to treat the brothers as individuals... when it suits :yep

    If Vitali and Wlad are "ruling together" then Lewis ruled the division with Holyfield, etc.
     
  7. In_FlaMeS

    In_FlaMeS K-BKois Full Member

    954
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    Okkkk but this is not the fault of the Klitschko brothers if the HW division is f*cking weak
     
  8. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    They have each other to fight.

    I'm not saying that they should fight each other, but not doing so comes at a price.

    The price is that neither dominates.
     
  9. lefthook89

    lefthook89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,569
    82
    Sep 28, 2009
    this one is good, but there has been better. i was actually wondering when you were gonna pick this one up though:D
     
  10. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    FW-You don't have to be an undisputed champ to be considered dominant. Larry Holmes did it. Did he unify every belt? All you can do is fight the best available opponents and dominate.

    Moreover, Wlad has lineage claim to three of the four straps (IBF,WBA,WBO) and the Ring Belt. He also beat Peter (future WBC champ) before Vitali did. So, it's not like he's some paper champ. The man has earned his status as a legit champ...
     
  11. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    It is the fault of some of the lunatics who frequent this forum that they deliberately refuse to accept this fact.
     
  12. wingchung

    wingchung Active Member Full Member

    1,416
    0
    Oct 17, 2009
    your dumbass just said haye would beat holmes. nuff said.
     
  13. p.falk

    p.falk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,370
    0
    Dec 20, 2006
    What a crock of ****.
    Whenever anyone is at the top of the heavyweight division people have always criticized the level of the opposition.
    It's funny hearing people like you talk.... talking all nostalgically about Lennox Lewis. Do you really not recall hearing the same thing when he was king? That the opponents were jokes (Michael Grants) or never weres (Francois Botha) or past primes (Mike Tyson).

    Speaking of Tyson, they said the same about him....
    Overhyped (Spinks) ... past their prime (Larry Holmes).

    Speaking of Holmes.........
     
  14. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    :patsch
     
  15. Jazzo

    Jazzo Non-Facebook Fag Full Member

    9,543
    4
    Feb 5, 2006
    I'm well aware of that.

    I think you are in the wrong thread.