Yey but this poll is the last 20 years. 6years doesnt come close to any of the fighters on this list. Morales and Barrera have a way better resume and they dont even have any votes!
Sure, I actually had it a draw, and I'll admit, I tried to find reasons to score it for DLH. But if you notice, I could have easily added Trinidad and Mosley II to that list, but I didn't. So I'll make the proper adjustments, and add a couple that I forgot. :good Rafael Ruelas John John Molina Ike Quartey Pernell Whitaker Julio Cesar Chavez X2 Fernando Vargas Pernell Whitaker Ricardo Mayorga Hector Camacho Yori Boy Campas Jesse James Leija Jorge Paez Oba Carr Javier Castillejo Tito Trinidad Shane Mosley II Miguel Angel Gonzalez Genaro Hernandez There I removed Sturm for your sake, added Trinidad and Mosley II because we can't have DOUBLE STANDARDS, and also added Gonzalez and Hernandez whom I forgot to add the first time. Wow, his resume now looks even better! Thanks for the heads up! :good
Exactly!!!! As fans, we shouldn't punish fighters for taking risks! Oscar lost to the very best and he beat some of the very best. No shame there.
I haven't heard much of a case mounted for WHITAKER or BARRERA yet. I think both of these guys are very live contenders in this poll. Anyone agree or disagree? Barrera: Two wins over Morales, a win over Hamed, and a host of other very solid wins over a good period of time Whitaker: Unbeaten through his prime (excluding that joke of a decision in the first Ramirez fight), wins over ATGs in Chavez and Nelson, and very good wins over the likes of McGirt (underrated welter), Ramirez, Haugen, etc - also a win over peak Oscar, depending on your scoring
So let me get this straight.... I Fighter lets say fight 20 Great and maybe HOF fighters and loses 17 of them. Because he takes the risk we should not punish that boxer.:huh
Something else which has not really been discussed (except with reference to Oscar) is how individual scorings can affect peoples' view of resume. For instance, Whitaker lost to Oscar and Toney lost the first fight with Sam Peter, going by the official scores. But if you scored either fight the other way and have a strong feeling that you are right and the official decision was wrong, then that can have a huge impact on the value of the resume. Whitaker and Toney both have strong resumes IMO, considering the eras they fought in, but consider these as additions: - while past-prime and 2 weights above his natural, Whitaker takes the zero of one of the best young fighters in the world - while years past-prime and clearly overweight, former middleweight champ Toney goes toe-to-toe with the consensus number 2 in the heavyweight division and wins If you scored these fights this way, these two resumes are in severe contention too.
This doesn't make sense. Why won't you count Pac's losses, he's not undefeated, and he also hasn't faced fighters who are better than the ones DLH faced. The difference between DLH and Pac is that DLH lost to some great fighters while Pac lost to a shot fighter and a couple of bums, and DLH fought higher caliber of opposition more consitantly, more often.
Whittaker was a great fighter in the 90s but he has not had a significant win over 10 years,also popkins you cant have a double standard and give credit to pernell for wins over Haugen and Ramirez and not include Chavezs wins over ROsario which you made clear at the beginning of this thread. Also i am very adament that the fight with Oscar should not even be mentioned because there is no way he beat Oscar. Pernells best years were really only 1/2 of the 90s so im not sure if he even belongs on this list
What difference does this make?? The vast majority of his resume was constructed within the last 20 years. It doesn't matter a jot when his last fight was. I don't think you understand the question. If the question was who has had the best resume of the last 50 years, would you rule Ali out because he hasn't had a fight for 30 years?? Erm, yes I can. Again, I don't think you quite grasp the question. Either that or you can't count up to 20. Whitaker's wins over Haugen and Ramirez were within the last 20 years, Chavez's win over Rosario was not. Simple (or it should have been). But as I said, anyone who wants to vote Chavez can click Other, and state their choice as a post. I don't view JCC as a valid choice therefore I didn't include him in my poll, but I left the option to vote for him if people wished to do so. Even if he was included, he wouldn't win anyway, he definitely doesn't have the best resume of all the fighters listed. Many people think Pernell beat Oscar. There is a whole thread dedicated to it in the Classic right now. All of Pernell's best years are included in the time frame except 1988, we are only missing 1 of his prime years by going back 20. Within the 20-year time period, we have his wins over Nelson, Chavez, McGirt(2), Haugen, Ramirez, Vasquez, and (if you scored it that way) Oscar. I think you need to do a little revision on Pea's career.
ok I will say Oscar, but a good mention is Trinidad wins over Yori Boy Campas David Reid William Joppy Oscar De La Hoya Fernando Vargas Pernell Whittiker Hector Camacho Ricardo Mayorga Also tito has beat guys before delahoya ever got to them and was declared the best welterweight in a long time plus fights with Bernard Hopkins, Winky Wright, Roy Jones. the guy is amazing but as resumes gotta be Lennox Lewis or Holyfield
Just off the top of my head these fighters stand out: Shane Mosley Bernard Hopkins Jermain Taylor Oscar De La Hoya After a few more fights, Miguel Cotto could be pretty high up.
He doesn not have a good resume? If you think that, you're even dumber than I thought.atsch Hopkins x2 Winky Wright Carl Froch Kelly Pavlik x2 Arthur Abraham