Ok I see what you're saying. So, by your own admission, if compubox says Haye landed more shots, you will admit Haye won the fight?
...I've never shown an ounce of favoritism towards British fighters in my three years here. Get off that campaign, I scored the fight for Haye because he landed harder shots, and barely took a solid shot himself.
Incorrect, the points system is on a rd by rd basis, scored on effective agression, clean punches landed, ring generalship and defense. A lot of hayes shots are cuffs as well , some people would not call these proper clean punches Ring generalship , well when your chasing another guy all night thats usually that defense , I dont call defense standing a half mile away and skipping from left to right, that's simply refusing to engage. Clean punches landed is up for debate however I think valuev lead on a lot of the 4 criteria for the most part, Interpratation of the criteria is subjective and basicly ones opinion, thats why groups of people can have different cards and as well as the reason for there being 3 judges .
It would force me to rewatch that fight in slow motion even though it seemed like in slow motion when watching it live.
We do know how to read. Title says... "post you Valuev-Haye scorecards (NON BRITS ONLY!)" That means Brits can't post their scorecard. Doesn't say anything about not being able to post at all :yep
I put that because I wanted to see how non brits scored it and also wanted to avoid arguing with people.
I refused to give anyone a round, so technicall it would be like 0:0, 108:108 or 120:120 ? Ok, Haye won round 12, so he probably won 10:0.
God get over it, you clearly know **** about boxing :nut Poll says it all as has every other poll on this forum and others :hi: