Muhammad Ali 1974 v Riddick Bowe 1992

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Nov 9, 2009.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,101
    8,534
    Jul 17, 2009
    Somebody suggested this matchup to me over the weekend. I take Ali to win by substantial points margin. Muhammad may have been a tad slower than his 60's best,but still a lot faster than a 1991 Tubbs who bothered Bowe a lot. Riddick would have his moments,but Ali would take his best shots when he had to,and dodge a lot more of them and make Bowe pay with counters.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,102
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    Think it would be a very entertaining fight. Pretty sure also that Ali would fight a smarter fight than Evander did.
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,101
    8,534
    Jul 17, 2009
    For certain :good
     
  4. tonysaprano

    tonysaprano Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    I reckon folk look at Ali, Marciano et al with Rose tinted glasses, if you look at the some of the old fights they were totally woefull, terrible in fact. Saying Ali is STILL the greatest is like saying Ben Hohnson is the fastest runner. Boxings the same as athletics in that the guys get quicker, stronger, bigger, increased power. Records fall in every sport but no-one says a past athlete is the best of all time, strange eh. Could Ali have beaten a prime Lewis I doubt it. Let the disagreers begin:D
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    Bowe gives the 74 Ali some trouble, but still drops a clear UD.

    The prime Ali white washes Bowe, and maybe even stops him.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,102
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    I have a very hard time seeing in the version of Ali stopping Bowe, especially inside 12. You can makee a reasonable case for it since Ali stopped both Bonavena and Foreman, but personallly I just don't see it.
     
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,102
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    Holmes, at 24, was Ali's sparring partner in 1974. In 1992, at 42, he was a legit condenter for the title and put in a good showing against Holyfield, who himself came withing an inch of being 2-1 against Bowe despite being past prime in arguably all three fights.

    A 25-year old Foreman lost his title to Ali in 1974 only to win it back 20 years later against a guy that had taken the same title from Holyfield.

    Out of curiosity, what do you make of this?:smoke

    (Incidentally, I think Lewis and Wladimir would be very tough opponents for Ali)
     
  8. wellsini

    wellsini Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,266
    16
    Jul 6, 2009
    I totally agree:good
     
  9. tonysaprano

    tonysaprano Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    I hear what your saying but the guy Foreman beat to take the title was very very poor. styles make fights as they say and the sun shines on a dogs ass some days, know what I mean. Foreman had to take him on cause he wouldnt have got anywhere else with the other champions at the time. But your right Ali would struggle with both Lewis and Big Klit
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,102
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    But at the end of the day two guys that peaked in the 70's made an impact in the 90's. Holmes for example had an easier time with Mercer than either Holyfield or Lewis had. How does that correlate with your view that boxing had advanced so much?

    The success Foreman and Holmes had in the 90's is what you would expect their peak versions to have against such competition (Mercer, Briggs, Morrison, Holyfield etc) according to your view. But the fact is that they were long past their peak versions.
     
  11. tonysaprano

    tonysaprano Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Oct 30, 2008

    Yeah I see your point, but experience goes a long way also, and Holmes had that in spades. But Tyson smashes Holmes, Lewis smashes Tyson, and I smash Lewis, eh, no sctratch the last one:good Still dont believe that Ali is the greatest of all time, plus there is no way of telling really is there. Look at Marciano, unbeaten, but could you really tell me he could beat even Haye?? At just under 5ft 10, and a smidgen over 13st, I think not, he wouldnt even be a cuiserweight now, light heavy at best, even a fat Ricky Hatton would blast him, although Hatton would be a bit heavy:D
     
  12. ExplosiveTinMan

    ExplosiveTinMan I am watever u say i am Full Member

    40
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    I don't think u can compare boxing to athletics. I wouldn't doubt that Ali could beat Lewis ( it would be tough ) and I wouldn't write off rocky either. Lennox was knocked out by worse alot worse.
    U said some of the old fights were awful did u watch Haye V Valuev ffs? The skill level of vast majority of the heavyweights around now is shocking as is the conditioning.
    Also are u just talking HWs or every weight class? If so would u take Cotto or Mosley to beat SRR at welter?
    U talk about Ben "Hohnson" Johnson, lets talk about other sports. Would Pele and Maradona not be the best players around if they were playin today? Of course they would. Would Jack Nicklaus not be challenging Woods if he were playin today? sure he would. Those sports have a skill level to them as does boxing unlike sprinting.
    I agree that people get too nostalgic when looking at past sports stars and dont give enough credit to the modern era especially in boxing. But u r in the extreme opposite.
    I see Ali outpointing Lewis mainly from workrate and outlanding him decisively, making Lewis look foolish at times. But it would be hard for him and Lewis would have a good chance, no doubt
    To the original question, seein as its the 74 Ali I think Bowe will give him problems. But Ali is too smart for Bowe and will tie him up when he needs to. Id say it would be a close but clear UD for Ali.
     
  13. ExplosiveTinMan

    ExplosiveTinMan I am watever u say i am Full Member

    40
    0
    Oct 5, 2009
    Pfff... If i had read this post I wouldn't have bothered responding to your 1st post. I imagine ur on the wind up. In case ur not, GO ****ING DIE!!!
     
  14. tonysaprano

    tonysaprano Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
     
  15. tonysaprano

    tonysaprano Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Oct 30, 2008

    Ho steady big chap, no need for the last bit:patsch Not at the wind up, a 13st Marciano would get killed by Haye, easily, come on you know it makes sense. Was joking about HATTON though