HAYE is the best hwy in this post-Lewis Era?

Even if Haye was 9 foot tall, he's still not the best heavy yet, and maybe never will be.

 

The ****? atsch

 

I hope your right because the current batch of heavyweights are boorrring!

 

if doesn't change anything that side of the pond, then why do u all talk so much about him?

 

I'm glad to see at least one Haye fan admit that he's not the best. Idk why all these people think he's such an amazing fighter. Once he gets in the ring with a dangerous opponent Haye will lose eventually. Haye's not a bad fighter, but i def don't see him holding on to the belt for long. All these new hw prospects are gonna love to get Haye's belt before one of the Klitschkos' belts.

 

:thumbsup

 

Funny how so many say the "brothers will never be great" "Not very good" "Only good in a horrible division"...........yet if Haye beats them then haye himself will be considered great?:huh

 

If you consider the bros ans the only good fighters around, then beating one of them is an accomplishment. An accomplishment that they can't do because they can't fight each other.

Personally, I think Wlad can be considered great if he keeps on winning. Even in a sub par division. The longevity has to count for something.

 

Maybe because stupid thread starters like this bring up this rediculous shitt on a dailey basis

 

To early to tell

 

atsch

 

well said. where the feck do these posters come from?:yep

 

Please don't use logic with the "UK" Haye nuts.:nut

 

Adrenaline-pumped stupid threads like this are normal after a fight.

In his next few fights, when Haye looks bad or even loses, he is "exposed" and was never that good to begin with.