Shocker of a PPV. Khan in a gimme defence, and a prospect against a gatekeeper type. This is FFN **** not PPV.
If only they could get Brook-Jennings and/or Cleverly's Euro push on the bill and it'd look a lot more enticing. As far as Mitchell-Prescott goes, I found the Mitchell-Burns match up a lot more appealing myself, but then I suppose this one should play better with the casuals.
What better way for some newbie idiot to announce his arrival on the site with that brilliant play on words :good Got anymore Wordsworth ???
You talking about wg2? Its just Worlds Greatest who was banned before (created endless Audley threads...), and I am guessing he will be banned again soon enough :good
I refer to my previous 20 answers... The worse PPV EVER was Graham Earl vs Kevin Bennett... £10 :-( Chief support: Tony Oakey vs Peter Haymor
This PPV will do horribly, especially as its a month after 800,000 people paid for Haye v Valuev. The general public don't care for Khan now he's not on itv, which is a shame-and the "internetzzzzzzzz fans" can see it for the rip-off it is. Presumably it'll be a'la Khan v Kotelnik. The Olympians live, plus one more fight, Mitchell v Prescott or Brook v Jennings if it comes off, then the main event. Anything else and you'll be reduced to watching a 5 second highlight of it as the sky lot want to get home-even when there might be an hour left of the programme.atsch
nah. way worse than the last warren ppv and that was shoddy. i'll watch the replay or "listen to it on the radio"
I think people are getting a bit pissy about PPV's and with good reason. Warrens last PPV card (the Khan/Kotelnik one) was ****ing brilliant but nobody outside of the arena got to see it. Why not cut the panel out of it and just employ 2 commentators with special guest (ex boxer or summat)to do the show from ringside and show the whole bill (within reason) live