oh carl froch....

You're not going to get much interest in your thread if you are too lazy/daft/arrogant to actually allow people to know what the **** you're talking about!

 

Carl Froch: "You can't take no risks. This is boxing, and boxing is about hitting and not getting hit. Haye virtually didn't get hit in that fight, he was a well deserved winner on the night"

For a moment there I thought he was talking about Dirrell

 

What is this all about?

 

Strange for Froch to say that since Haye/Valuev was like Dirrell/Froch in many ways, the Brits must be confused trying to defend both Haye and Froch.

 

Boxing is the art of hitting and not being hit eh Carl? Then why do you do the complete opposite.lol.
To be fair he makes some valid points amongst all his usual crap.
Also it was weird to hear him say something positive about another fighter other than Kessler. He and Haye are obviously really good mates.

 

:rofl

 

I am English and I am not confused!!! I said at the time Dirrell deserved to win as technically he was far better than Froch threw more punches,landed more,slipped lots of punches and made Froch look very ordinary.I had Direll winning 8 out of 12 rounds.

 

I said the same thing, apparently Americans dont hear so well.

 

I know really.

 

froch owned and exposed himself

 

ifficult situation for Froch because he was Valuev in his fight with Dirrell.

 

:thumbsup what a massive contradiction by froch. the guy can't get out of the way of ****...