True or False: Floyd needs Pac more than Pac needs Floyd?

cotto sucks

 

Very insightful, tell me, do you write for Ring Magazine by any chance?

 

Post of the Year right there, my man. Great work, and same with the person you quoted. That says it all.

 

This was yesterday's News Video Story

http://video.nytimes.com/video/2009...dow-of-pacquiao.html?scp=2&sq=pacquiao&st=cse

The New York Times love the Pacman

I bring this up because the NYT's is the be all and end all of NEWS.

 

Mayweather needs Pac (plus a couple more names) to cement his place as a bona fide ATG.

With or without Mayweather on his resume, Pac is already considered an ATG in the eyes of many.

In saying that, a win for Pac could possibly put Pac's name up there in the G.O.A.T. stakes, for future generations to argue about.

So there is a lot riding on it for both fighters.. but Mayweather needs this fight more as it will hurt his legacy if he doesn't take it.

 

LOL Hey Paul you seen Bazooka around :good

 

:rofl

 

LOL! No, I haven't now that you mention it. :rofl:good

 

Prolly Darchinyan???

 

Very very very true !!!!!!!!

But he'll be shitting his pants after that display , he'll be duckin Pac all ends up !!!!!

 

Absolutely Floyd needs Pacman more now. Pacman is building his legacy and Floyd has not. If Floyd cares about his legacy he has to fight Pacman. If he beats Pacman he will take some of Pacman's legacy and he will become a legend like Pacman. And I do think he might be able to outbox Pacman.

 

False imo, both need each other.

 

Except unlike titles, p4p has always been subject to change by opinion and not necesarily swap around the as Hatton would have you believe. Floyd did nothing for 2 years, you cant do nothing for 2 years whilst another climbs the ladder and still expect to be viewed as the best. There's a new king in town, long live the king!