Not so impressive, really. 2006, one fight, Collazo, at welter - some feel Collazo won, we'll disclude this one as it's a different weight. 2007 - Juan Urango; a come-at-you guy, not unbeatable. Jose Luis Castillo - old, shot, had been a featherweight earlier in his career. We'll go ahead and give him a pass on Floyd, since again - different weight. 2008 - Lazcanosaurus. So? And Ricky got hurt a couple of times, inexplicably. Paulie Malignaggi - has since admitted that there was no chemistry or cohesion in his corner with Buddy McGirt; wasn't comfortable with changing styles and it didn't suit him. An off-night, he looked worse than anybody expected and it in turn made Hatton look good (and convinced everybody that he'd smash Pacquiao...) 2009 - Pacquiao - wrecked him. Positively annihilated him. A flyweight. So, since vacating after Maussa, he is 4-1 (2). Two victories over shot old lightweights, one over a sturdy but ultimately ham-and-eggs guy, and one over a B+ fighter on an extreme off-night, mistrained and operating outside of his usual style. The one loss? To a former flyweight, who toyed with him for six minutes before literally putting him to sleep. Yet he's still the #1 light welterweight in the world today (with Pac officially moving up to 147), according to boxrec's computerized rankings? 50 points over Timothy Bradley? How is this justified? At some point you have to stop giving guys the benefit of the doubt based on what they accomplished over four years ago. That means you, "computer".
Let's do it, cubey! :happy I just need a few hundred grand in capital investment. It'll be returned tenfold, promise. :deal
Nah man. That would mean closing up the horse condom factory plus the computer ain't bias,just stupid. Humans are the other way around.
