why do people put duran ahead of pac on atg list???

4 u, your criteria is enough. but for many others, its not.:happy

 

thats why i asked in one of my posts, whats the standard?? and as u said, they cant give u a criteria, because that criteria doesnt qualify him to be in the top 10 atg :bloodrankings.

 

:happy:happy:happy

 

atsch My god some people are ****ing ******ed. Get Pacquiao's nuts out your mouth.

 

Why am I not surprised that a Duran dickrider would consider calling someone a pedophile a super clever remark? I thought that was a bannable offense.

 

can you see Kirkland Lang beating Manny Pac?

during prime years?

 

thats why hagler gets the respect that he gets. its because he beat the atg's in his era. and the srl loss, is debatable. however, srl did win, so be it. just a side note: hagler wanted a rematch, and leonard said no. anyways, if hagler lost to duran, srl (decisively) and hearns, theres no way he's ranked in the top 20 (at least) with the atg's. :bbb

 

I agree with this statement. Well put. Pacquiao has a way to go in accomplishments. Not to mention an early post that said Duran is the only fighter to fight in 5 different decades. He also beat Leonard in his prime.

 

Anyone who wants to know more about Duran should read this article by Monte Cox. It's an extremely good article.

http://coxscorner.tripod.com/duran.html

 

WTFatsch Duran was not in his prime against Laing,its been said a ****ing ZZZZiilllion times already. Duran was pretty much Hot and cold after the 1st Leonard fight. He had been fighting pro for about 14 years before that fight,and had long ago established himself an ATG. Manny has barely established himself an ATG,but yey i can see Manny losing to a lower top 10 contender when hes uninspired and past his best.

 

Because Duran would knock Pacman out ****in cold at Lightweight or welter.
No doubt about it.

 

Why don't you post somewhere else?

 

This is pretty stupid stuff, so much so it's hard to even comment on. So if Pac lost to Hopkins, Paul Williams and Floyd, would that mean he wasn't a great fighter, when he beat every fighter his own size and went on to beat Cotto, ODL and Hatton?

Or would it just mean that the smaller Pac got beat by bigger fighters who were themselves pretty good fighters?

Would Williams beating Pac make him a better fighter or give him a better legacy than Pac?

 

:good