Did Joe Calzaghe "Ruin" Mikkel Kessler?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paulfv, Nov 21, 2009.


  1. ed7890

    ed7890 Col. Hunter Gathers Full Member

    8,170
    0
    Apr 4, 2009
  2. steveedster

    steveedster Member Full Member

    184
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    All these people who talk about Kess was a hype job, not a world level fighter etc are really starting to annoy me, this is a problem with many boxing fans today. Just because a fighter loses does not mean he is a hype job etc, he just lost a fight. Kessler held 2 of the belts at SMW and then lost these to Calzaghe, after this he went on to win one of these belts back, and a few yrs later lost it in only his 2nd pro defeat. He is obviously an elite/world level fighter at SMW, fighters lose people, its part of the sport we all love on here, very very few retire without a loss.
     
  3. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,602
    Jul 22, 2004
    Great post. :good
     
  4. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    No.

    Kessler didn't take a bad beating from Calzaghe and he hasn't been in any real wars. He went into last nights fight as a world-class fighter in his athletic prime.

    Just because he lost doesn't mean he was "ruined", "overrated", "exposed" or any of the other words thrown around far too easily on this forum.

    I prefer to give credit to Ward for a superb victory.
     
  5. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,302
    Jan 4, 2005
    yes, because the greatest boxers of all time were all undefeated...afterall, no way they could perform after loosing, they would all be ruined! :patsch
     
  6. Ricjkards

    Ricjkards New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    Jun 18, 2008
    It was his first loss. Kessler is a confidence fighter, he doesn't have that same confidence anymore after his first loss. He didn't didn't turn up last night.
     
  7. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    He was very flat last night, no doubt. Credit has to be given to Ward, minus the dirty tactics, but Mikkel looked like a ghost of what he had been.

    Not sure if his confidence has gone down after the Calzaghe loss and some minor-tiered bouts since.
     
  8. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Ward is a bad stlye matchup for Kessler, period. Kessler is a basic 1-2 puncher with no inside game, and who doesn't go to the body. He went up against a faster, multi dimensional boxer. Ward can fight on the inside, he can fight on the outside, he can fight right or lefty, he can box, he can brawl. The guy can basically do everything. I said before the fight that this was the toughest matchup for Kessler and that he would lose. Styles make fights people. It's as simple as that. The complaining about the rough house tactics is ridiculous as well. It was clear as day from the 1st round that Ward's speed and versatility were going to be a real problem for Kessler. Kessler was not ruined by Calzaghe. Kessler lost because he went up against a guy who had all the tools to exploit Kessler's weaknesses.
     
  9. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    Ward probably would beat Kessler without the elbowing, excessive holding, headbutting and an absolute joke hometown ref.

    Unfortunately, we weren't given the opportunity to find that out last night.

    As I said, Taylor got beat but he got beat cleanly by Abraham. The two other fights were embarrassing because of the tactics employed. Likely, both fights were won by the right guy but they both detracted from what should be a great tournament. That was especially true last night. Two headbutts appeared to cut both of Kessler's eyes, and that affected the outcome of the fight.
     
  10. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,138
    1,194
    Aug 6, 2005
    This thread is a joke, don't take the bait.
     
  11. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    No, no -- as usual, you are the joke. But that's well-established by now, so no need for anyone to take the bait or be wary of finding it out.
     
  12. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,130
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

    Damn, some of the guys here I wouldn't even spit on.

    The only one Calzaghe ruined was Lacy, he didn't even ALREADY RUINED AND SHOT Hopkins or Jones so **** OFF with that theory.
     
  13. FrochPascal

    FrochPascal Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,682
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    No he didnt ruin him but you never know phycologically what went on. As ive said i give credit to Ward...but wasthat really as good as Mikkel could fight? Im not sure
     
  14. miketysonko

    miketysonko Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,387
    337
    Dec 29, 2006
    :lol:
     
  15. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    1
    Jul 7, 2007
    The key for Ward from the Calzaghe fight was he learned what the correct approach to defeating Kessler was.

    So, even if Kessler had not been ruined by Calzaghe -- a point open to debate -- then the blueprint for how to defeat Kessler was laid out.

    Ward used that blueprint, complete with elbows, headbutts, excessive holding and a joke ref. None of which the vastly-superior Calzaghe needed to beat Kessler easily, 8-4 or 9-3.