What Fighter had a Successful Boxing Career with Virtually NO REAL TALENT???

Thanks for sharing your emotions. However I'm sure I've been a Hopkins fan for far longer than you have, and I've 100% guaranteed seen more of his fights than you have. So I'd say that wether you're reeling or not is pretty much meaningless.

 

alexander povetkin

 

When I read the thread title, that's whose name came to mind, Butter Bean!

 

Listen, don't take it personally or get defensive. This is not a competition to see who can prove who is the bigger fan. Regardless of whether or not you have seen more Hopkin's fights than me-although your statement is pretty brash. Your post indicates although you have followed Hopkin's career, sadly you don't appear to know what your watching.

So you could have watched more fights than me, but judging from your post's (Not just this one) i personally don't believe you know alot about the sport.

 

You don't know ****! Gatti and Vargas both had loads of talent and skill.

 

Ricky Hatton had a very successful amateur career and was hyped long before he even turned pro, he had a lot of talent, but was trained terribly by Billy Graham.

 

Laila Ali.

 

Clearly it doesnt stop you waffling 100% SHITE !!!!!!

 

wow

 

you should leave the forum after that statement . . .lol.

 

:good My sentiments exactly, but put in a more friendly way of course.

 

theres nothing brash about my statement, you just didn't understand it. Those who get it are the ones I was speaking to.

 

:hi:

LMAO.

 

John Ruiz is the only fighter that should be on the list.

 

Actually, i did't understand the part when you clicked on to this thread, read the question and then answered with Bernard Hopkins.

Run that by me again. On second thoughts, actually, don't.