Ali Funeka v Joan Guzman

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Nov 23, 2009.


  1. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    One day his inactivity and bad between fights habits are going to catch up with Guzman.

    I have a sneeky feeling that that day is this fight.
     
  2. bennie

    bennie Active Member Full Member

    725
    1
    Sep 16, 2009
    Dominican bad boy Joan Guzman takes on Ali Funeka in Canada this Saturday for the vacant IBF lightweight title.
    Guzman gets a shot despite the stigma of his aborted showdown with Florida's Nate Campbell last year in America. The unbeaten, usually fearless Guzman tried to scupper the fight by coming in overweight. Campbell agreed to fight him at catchweight. Guzman also agreed but then pulled a few hours before the fight, claiming he felt unwell.
    Campbell lost out on a $300,000 payday.
    Known as "Lil' Tyson", Guzman certainly acted like the boorish former heavyweight champ (in fairness to Tyson he usually turned up on the night) and was three-and-a-half pounds over on the scales. Guzman can fight - but does he want to fight? This is a man who has failed to stop his last eight opponents, who hasn't fought since last December and who has held WBO titles at super-bantamweight and super-featherweight.
    There is no way in the world he should fail to make lightweight.
    Anyway, the 33-year-old Guzman has a chance to make amends for all that against Funeka, who did have the bottle to take on Campbell earlier this year in Campbell's native Florida, where he held him to a majority 12-round decision. It broke a hot 16-fight winning streak (14 early) for the 31-year-old South African puncher, who would have won but for a couple of knockdowns he suffered, one in the second round, the other in the 11th. (Ironically, and it does seem to be contagious, Campbell came in overweight but at least he climbed into the ring.)
    "Rush Hour" Funeka has lost only to Mzonke Fana and Campbell in 34 outings and crushed good American Zahir Raheem in four rounds last year. With 25 early wins he is obviously a threat to the flaky Guzman but, despite the latter, the durable, slick-boxing Guzman is probably the pick.
     
  3. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I'll go with Guzman for the UD in this fight.

    BTW Guzman would have schooled AA and SH on the same night......with one hand tied behind his back.........and his feet cemented to the ring canvas:smooch
     
  4. afonso_alves

    afonso_alves Active Member Full Member

    510
    0
    Nov 19, 2008
    where do you watch all these 'non hyped mainstream' international fights. can never find em on youtube :huh
     
  5. faisal

    faisal Hoolios daddy Full Member

    4,980
    2
    Feb 24, 2007
    he beat world class fighters unlike arthur and harrison, he put on a boxing clinic against soto, the mans been avoided for years no 1 wants a part of him, he'd be in more big fights if ppl had the balls to face up to him and hes had personal troubles outside the ring the stoped him from fulfilling his potential and i'm backing Funeka to beat him due to inactivity
     
  6. themacallan

    themacallan Chin Chin Full Member

    563
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    <---- you ****ing tell 'em dunky.

    Guzman is a **** gobbler
     
  7. themacallan

    themacallan Chin Chin Full Member

    563
    0
    Jul 19, 2004
    absolute pish. **** couldn't fight sleep.

    He's done nothing since moving up.
     
  8. He may well be a **** gobbler but he is an elite level fighter with considerable natural ability.

    Funeka will be a toguh test that hopefully he will pass. Then, hopefully, he continues to progress to bigger fights with some bigger names.
     
  9. Top Dog

    Top Dog Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,276
    1
    Oct 10, 2006
    Guzman points, bit of a wasted talent though really
     
  10. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    Youtube or round at my mates, just in case!
     
  11. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009

    :deal

    Could have been a serious challenger for P4P best IF he had been more dedicated.
     
  12. ollyc

    ollyc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,882
    0
    Jul 17, 2009
    Yeah, it's a real shame that he's never had the opportunity to fight for the unified WBA/IBF/WBO Lightweight title. Oh wait ...
     
  13. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    What do we know bout Funeka?

    -high workrate
    -shaky whiskers
    -good punching power
    -leaky defense
    -doesn't have a stiff jab
    -doesn't have superior handspeed9compared to Guzman)

    Anything else?
     
  14. Mazallan

    Mazallan ESB yes man Full Member

    7,522
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    I hope Guzman turns up. Should be a good fight.
     
  15. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    big fan of guzman. hope to see him vs katsidis, valero and marqez