Which is a better back2back comp? MAB/JMM/Morales or ODLH/Hatton/Cotto

3 k battery

 

Bruseles,Gatti,Mitchell

 

Sosa-Ndou-Corley.

 

His future one

FMJ/Dawson/Valuev

 

Nobody ever fought MAB/JMM/Morales back to back. :deal

 

Both were pretty tough fights but i gotta go with delahoya-hatton and cotto since all 3 were supposed to KO pacquiao.

 

Mab,JMM, Morales were the best of the best at the time for sure.

 

ODLH, Hatton and JMM:rofl

 

Dead on the money. I would add Collazo broke Hatton's confidence first at WW. Clottey cemented the fact that Cotto was shot.

 

ODLH - Was at his own weight class and a money fight.
Hatton - Was "undefeated" and a money fight.
JMM - Do you tards not understand a tune up slash common opponent?

All the other WW were nobodies at the time of FMJ's rise. Margarito was less of a name than Baldomir. SSM was a LM barely getting past Mayorga.

 

:dead

 

The mexicans by far. Maybe they were no longer at their very best, but ODLH was GONE, Hatton doesn't even belong in the group talent wise. Cotto was a great victory.

Conquering the first group is a far more significant achievement to a boxing fan. The second group is far more significant to the general public.

 

dlh hatton and cotto are a bunch of bums, the three midgets gave a better fight for whatever reason

 

Get a life.

 

Morales, MAB & JMM were the higher class fighters IMO but thats in a p4p sense, beating DLH, Hatton & Cotto by KO is certainly a great achievement by a fighter that came from much lighter divisions. There`s no wrong answer I suppose.