Joe Calzaghe vs. Ezzard Charles

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, Nov 22, 2009.


  1. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    6,123
    2,872
    Mar 24, 2005
    Calzaghe retired undefeated, but Charles beats almost any man below the HW limit.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,868
    51,995
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think Conn is underated head to head. Guy was a demon.
     
  3. Hank

    Hank Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,463
    15
    Dec 30, 2006
    Poll i sunfair to Calzaghe. It's like asking if Pacquio could beat Monzon. Keep going in this direcction and we'll wind up with Willy Pep vs. Primo Canera.
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    No its not. This isn't an issue of size, it's an issue of superior attributes; Calzaghe has none against Charles.
     
  5. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,480
    4,181
    Jun 28, 2009
    Yeah, he is and was on both counts. Other than not having a true KO punch, he was a bloody marvel. Talk about being thrown in at the deep end aswell at the start of his career and his subsequent record (I refuse to use the word 'resume') :bart. Krieger, Young Corbett III, Apostoli, Yarosz, Bettina, Lesnevich, Zivic, Risko, Dundee, Pastor, Savold etc etc. And a knats knacker away from beating maybe the greatest heavyweight of time.

    Conn vs Charles would've made more sense.
     
  6. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009
    :good I couldn't agree more. Well put!!
     
  7. dublynflya

    dublynflya Stand your ground Son!! Full Member

    5,727
    7
    Oct 30, 2009

    Joe wants to be considered one of the greats so he (I'm sure) expects people like us to consider him in these fantasy fights. The fact that he hasn't fared too well thus far is predictable. He WAS a tremendous champion (And his career will be viewed more favourably in the passage of time) but he was never as good as he believed he was and I believe that (For whatever reason) we never truly saw the best of him. That is what is so damned frustrating about Joe Calzaghe!!! And I can't be the only one who thinks this, surely? As for him fighting Charles, well I have to bow to reason! Charles by mid round ko.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    The major factor imo here is that Charles is comfortable fighting at the advanced pace Calzaghe likes to set.
     
  9. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    Calzaghe by modern nutrition and sports science.
     
  10. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    Gay
     
  11. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    Charles is at a different level, but Joe is no mug, and is cute and tough enough to go the distance, maybe even sneaking a few rounds.

    Charles WU15 (11-4)
     
  12. Body Head

    Body Head East Side Rape (CEO) Full Member

    2,944
    1
    Nov 15, 2009
  13. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    How do u mean
     
  14. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    57
    Oct 15, 2007
    I was only kidding with that post. I don't agree though.
     
  15. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    its ridiculous to overlook the advantages a modern fighter (especially just being bigger) has while pointing out the disadvantages.