It's not a joke! i checked on this site http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=58717&cat=boxer
Sorry VALERO! Somebody just got your crown! Guzman had more TOMATO can boxers in his list compared to your resume! :rofl
hehehe Im rooting for Guzman, and the JMM fight for any thinking boxer, can give a blue print n beating Pac, if there was a boxer to expose flaws in Pac, it would be him, just like Sanchez did .
Agreed more or less. BAck when Guzman was 130 or under, Guzman, with it being closer every step towards 135. 135 and above Pacman, due to age and abilities at each weight.
Why do people mention JMM? He's a counter puncher who answered Pac's best with his own best. This is not Guzman. The comparison sucks. Guzman didn't look that great vs Soto or Barrios. These two guys brawl a lot, Pac can brawl much better than them, he's faster and hits harder. Pac stops him.
but guzman is harder to punch. pac aint faced anyone with such a good defence, guzman would definately give pac a good fight. certainly more competative than fights against david diaz and hatton. and pac ducked guzman at 122
122-130 ima go ahead and pick guzman. extremely good defense and i don't see pac being able to stay on his rhythm well enough to win over 12
I remember 2 years ago, alot here and I mean ALOT where picking Guzman over Pac. They where saying that he would school Pac, and that he was a stylistic nightmare for Pac. Glad I was one of those people who didn't fell for that bull****. So for 2 years now, I'm gonna say it again. Pac by KO.
Joan doesn't have great "D"! He's got good "D" but he gets hit by far slower and less powerful punchers than PAC. Soto got to him numerous times. If PAC gets to Joan he's getting slept.