Juan Manuel Lopez and Miguel Cotto in Yankee Staduim on same card?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by rican911, Nov 30, 2009.


Page 1 of 4
  1. rican911

    rican911 Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    Now since nobody gives a **** about either one, since both have been exposed, they might land on the same card to fill up Yankee Staduim LOL hahaha, its so obvious, that they've been exposed. :lol:


    I think Juan Manuel Lopez should headline the event if its made...here...these type of cards should of been done long ago.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jhXKyRM5ow[/ame]
     
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    #1
  2. rican911

    rican911 Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    on eve of Puerto Rican day parade, in New York, Gamboa vs Juanma !!
     
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    #2
  3. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    Cotto got exposed? No, he got beaten by the best fighter on the planet, you dick.
    :patsch
     
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    #3
  4. rican911

    rican911 Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    Lets be serious, I dont care if hes the best fighter on the planet !! Cottos supposed to be the best at 147, and he let a midget get his world ttle, and gain 7 world titles in 7 different divsions, on HIS WATCH. Hes supposed to be the best at his weight, and he let Pac take his belt, its stupid, doesnt make sense, he sucks, and so do you !!
     
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    #4
  5. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    So every fighter who has ever lost has been exposed? ******ed.
     
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    #5
  6. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Exposed? Your an idiot! ****in noob...:verysad
     
    jc, Nov 30, 2009
    jc, Nov 30, 2009
    #6
  7. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009
    :bart
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Nov 30, 2009
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Nov 30, 2009
    #7
  8. rican911

    rican911 Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 17, 2009
    Your ******ed the best WElterweight today lost to a guy 7 divsions beneath him, does that make sense? Only happened once in history !! And it wasnt some bum who gave up his belt, it was Miguel Cotto :lol: Anyway, he will be Co-Feature to Lopez. I doubt he'll headline a PPV again...
     
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    rican911, Nov 30, 2009
    #8
  9. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    i know this is kind of a wind up thread and you are being kind of a troll about cotto which you seem to do a lot lately. but this is stupid to say even for a troll. pac was not 7 divisions beneath him. he was 16 years old when he turned pro at that weight and he is 30 now. that is akin to saying ruiz got beat by a lww b/c rjj won the golden gloves championship at 139lbs when he was 17 years old.
     
    dbouziane, Nov 30, 2009
    dbouziane, Nov 30, 2009
    #9
  10. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    Cotto lost to a guy who started 7 weight divisions below welterweight. It's good that you're starting to like boxing, new fans are always welcome, but watch and learn about boxing before pretending to know what you're talking about.
     
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    #10
  11. drunkenspaniard

    drunkenspaniard Active Member Full Member

    774
    0
    Jul 25, 2004
    Yeah, Cotto sucks. And if Cotto sucks and Cotto beat Mosley, that means Mosley sucks. And since Mosley sucks and he beat De la Hoya, that means De La Hoya sucked. The past 15 years in boxing have been nothing but a lie. You should get some sort of award for exposing boxing for what it is. :good
     
    drunkenspaniard, Nov 30, 2009
    drunkenspaniard, Nov 30, 2009
    #11
  12. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005
    Newbies huh?:lol:
     
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    #12
  13. ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS

    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS YAHHHHH Full Member

    4,115
    4
    Mar 10, 2009

    First of all, Cotto was not the best welterweight. Second of all, he did not lose to a guy 7 divisions below him - comparing a 16 year old Pacquiao to the guy fighting today is downright stupid, borderline ******ed. In case you haven't noticed, Pacquiao has only lost 3 times, two of them a LONG time ago when he was just starting pro boxing. If it weren't for NALLEGE's constant reminders of those moments, I doubt not many would remember.
     
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Nov 30, 2009
    ]V[ooSeKnUcKLeS, Nov 30, 2009
    #13
  14. Dojo

    Dojo The Animal Full Member

    1,353
    2
    Aug 29, 2005

    Boxing has been exposed!:deal:D
     
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    Dojo, Nov 30, 2009
    #14
  15. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Only people who weren't paying attention thought Cotto was exposed. Those who have been paying attention, knew coming into the fight that Cotto was a one handed fighter with little defense, who often resorts to running when he gets into trouble. Anyway, Cotto will not be fighting at Yankee stadium. His fight will be at the Garden.
     
    BigReg, Nov 30, 2009
    BigReg, Nov 30, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 4