It's SO obvious the two judges were paid off in the Funeka/Guzman fight.

Concurred

 

There's no reason to make this about GBP. This goes on throughout the sport, regardless of the promoter, and yes the judges were paid off. There is no possible way for anyone to see that fight as anything but a win for Funeka. There's just no way.

Boxing needs a national commission.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=188366

Why did the mods close my thread above? Did GBP give the mods a ring and told them to close it? Were the mods bribed?

 

Man, now people are saying dumb **** like "Guzman won round 3." **** no he didn't

 

You could score for Guzman 6 rounds in this fight easy.
1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 7th and 12th.

 

You could also score 9 rounds for Funeka easily.

 

Yeah, so no robbery. Close fight. Draw is ok.

 

Agreed.

It's not possible to score that one for Guzman.

 

:rofl Yeah ok. Joan, is that you? Schaefer? De La Hoya?

Keep telling yourself that the fight was a draw.

 

For as long as they don't denounce it themsleves - or worst, try to defend the decision like De La Hoya did in the Malignaggi-Diaz post-fight press conference - it can be about GBP.

 

Guzman clearly won 4 rounds in the fight. There were a couple other close ones. A draw is reasonable.

Guzman is on the verge of the Hall of Fame but even i am not saying he won. But a draw is a very fair decision.

The reaction here is based on two things. Blood and HBO. But not based on round by round scoring.

 

http://www.ringtv.com/blog/1363/funeka_guzman_fight_to_majority_draw/

Check out this summary from The Ring, which is owned by De La Hoya.

Sounds pretty much like a company man trying to make it sound like the decision wasn't THAT bad.

 

Guzman couldn't see the HOF with a telescope from where he's standing. Wtf are you smoking? Crack rocks?