For pacquiao, its bradley and any other black fighters that are slick like floyd. For Floyd, probably the Mosley Berto winner
Pacquiao doesn't need any tune ups no more because he is so aware what the boxing fans want him to fight next, Floyd Mayweather Jr. For now Money Floyd is doing everything he can, if not duck, to perhaps ruin Pac's on the roll wins. Who knows Floyd might have a valid reason to excuse himself of fighting Pacquiao if the latter didn't do too impressive in his tune up fight or whatever **** reactions he can come up to against Pac after that. In any other way, Floyd Mayweather Jr. is so obvious in avoiding Manny Pacquiao. Funny thing this what we get after all those nonsense he said about Pac of not too direct in asking to fight him. :-(
**** these money grubbing homos. why would there need to be a tune up? the fight is already built up beyond belief. neither will fight anyone that will jeopardize the fight (thou yuri-pac sounds interesting). PBF - matt hatton would be a joke (though par for the course for pbf). just make the fight. edit: even if you think that floyed needs another fight before getting to pac given his layoff, what will fighting matt hatton or some other non-challenge really do for floyd? floyd looked good vs jmm so there shouldn't be any excuses.
the winner of Shane Mosley vs Berto for Floyd and for Pac either the winner of Mosley vs Berto or the winner of Bradley vs Lamont Peterson. I wouldn't call those fights tuneups though.
why blame pac, he reserved that date years ago. floyd on the other hand has no reason to refuse march, except some heresay tune-up fight again. fact is, march is exactly six months afterr his fight with jmm, so what else is his excuse? floyd is ducking pac.