The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    31,396
    Likes Received:
    3
    Shane didn't fight floyd because he was a risk at the time of Floyd's challenge. It was smart move by Shane then...doesn't mean Shane was scared... Karma!
     
  2. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    1
    Do you think Floyd would have a problem with a slick fighter?
     
  3. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    7,253
    Likes Received:
    105
    Maybe, maybe not, but thats not why he said it
     
  4. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    33,921
    Likes Received:
    134
    Everybody has problems with slick fighters and he would have too.
     
  5. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    7,654
    Likes Received:
    0
    he said name a slick fighter. I named one. Is he the slickest no, but more slicker than anyone pac has ever faced:hi:
     
  6. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2008
    Messages:
    7,253
    Likes Received:
    105
    And that means what?
     
  7. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    1
    Name a slick fighter who you think would give him problems?
     
  8. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    33,921
    Likes Received:
    134
    Winky Wright for starters.
     
  9. IVLG

    IVLG OBJECTIVITY IS BACK LOL Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    582
    Likes Received:
    1
    Their was a injury after an agreement to fight had been made, in the Mayweather v Marquez fight; and their is an 'injury" to keep a fight from being made in the case of Mayweather v Pac, but remember he was willing to move up to fight Yuri at 154 in March, but wont fight mayweather in March, spin that *******:deal
     
  10. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    1
    I doubt it...a boring fight, but far from hard.
     
  11. thechampizhere

    thechampizhere Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    **** may1st......the called out mayweather like he was some non descript fighter and he called there bluff and signed to fight in march now all of sudden he needs to heal yea pac fought twice this year but only one was a real match....do they need time to keep juicing manny to keep that speed and power because this **** starting to sound fishy
     
  12. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    Messages:
    33,921
    Likes Received:
    134
    Of course you being the groupie that you are you think hes unbeatable.
     
  13. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    1
    I know why he said it.
     
  14. thechampizhere

    thechampizhere Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,619
    Likes Received:
    0
    fam we talking almost 4mths after the cotto fight...eardrum should be healed late december if not already....they thought money wasnt going to take the fight and now he called there bluff and they need a whole new gameplan
     
  15. Zavy

    Zavy A fan among experts Full Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2008
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    1
    I don't think anyone is unbeatable dick sucker. I just don't see anyone around his weight who is going to beat him.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.