Who is the greatest British super-middleweight since the division started ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Legend X, Dec 4, 2009.

  1. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,315
    Likes Received:
    664
    Of the last 20 years or so.

    I think the second Eubank-Watson fight was the first big British fight at 168 division. 1991.

    Since then we've had several good super-middles coming out of the UK.

    Who's number 1 ?
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2009
    Messages:
    19,229
    Likes Received:
    257
    Calzaghe hands down. Title defence record, unified. His resume is lacking but Mitchell, Reid, Lacy and Kessler are good enough wins.
     
  3. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    54
    Agreed.
     
  4. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    24,237
    Likes Received:
    64
    Calzaghe by far. Who else ? Benn and Eubank are a distant 2nd and 3rd
     
  5. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    14,678
    Likes Received:
    183
    benn but i am biased and will happily admit it
     
  6. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,227
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    yes and me too:good
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    81
    Anyone that says anything other than Calzaghe is a ****wit & should have their biased/hater ass ignored for the rest of time.

    The End !
     
  8. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    38,042
    Likes Received:
    7,539
    I vote for the much maligned, disrespected Joe Calzaghe here...it's gonna take years for the myopic detractors of his to be proven wrong.
     
  9. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    12,227
    Likes Received:
    1,247
    i like benn because he's far more exiting to watch.is he better than calzaghe........probably no.
     
  10. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    20,813
    Likes Received:
    588
    robin reid



















































    aint i funny joe "40." cal
     
  11. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    20,813
    Likes Received:
    588
    i'll go for eubank at 168 and benn at 160.

    eubank is better than some peeps are saying.
     
  12. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    76
    I think it's close Between Benn, Eubank and Calzaghe.They all have some obvious strengths and weaknesses.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    264
    I'm going with Benn, he beat a P4P top5 fighter in McClellan, arguably beat Prime Eubank (most had him winning that draw), 4 wins over WBC titlists Galvano (twice), Nardiello and Mallinga. Wharton was also 1 of the best in Europe and Piper 1 of Britains best. Then throw in destructive wins against Barkley and Dewitt at MW and you have a mighty impressive resume

    Calzaghe is unbeaten but his best win at the weight is probably a past prime weight drained Eubank, followed by Kessler and Lacy, followed by a contentious decision against Reid, past it Mitchell, and Brewer. All good wins but none as impressive as McClellan. At 175lbs he has a contentious win over a 43yo Hopkins and a Shot Jones

    Also although Calzaghe is unbeaten he arguably has losses to Hopkins and Reid
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    42,723
    Likes Received:
    264
    The thing is Eubank couldn't be assed at 168 and had many disputed decisions, perhaps because of the Watson incident
     
  15. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2004
    Messages:
    4,964
    Likes Received:
    76
    Wharton is underrated a bit.Not my kind of fighter, but he'd do really well were he around today.

    Very good chin, great power and terrific left-hook.His offensive skills were good, with a heavy sharp jab and some tidy combinations..triple left hooks, doubling up on the right hand etc..

    Also a one-paced plodder that looked far less impressive against anyone using a lot of lateral movement, but still....I'd have bet on him wrecking Froch, LAcy or Taylor.

    I thought the Eubank fight took a lot out of him though.Eubank was really sharp that night, despite the weight issues he was having by that time.Some great counterpunching from him in it.




    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2KxniDWz5Y[/ame]