I've never made a top 100 p4p list but...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, Dec 8, 2009.


  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    here are some fighters and more or less what range I would place them in...

    top10 : SRR, Armstrong, SRL, Duran, Ali...

    11-20 : Whitaker, Marciano, Pacquiao...

    21-30 : Hagler, Arguello, Chavez, Roy Jones...

    31-40 : Holyfield, Floyd...

    41-50 : Ricardo Lopez, Hopkins, Lewis...

    51-60 : Mosley, Barrera, Morales...

    61-70 : Marquez, Oscar...

    71-80 : Tito, Toney, ...

    81-100 : Vitali K, Calzaghe...

    Give me some fighters that i haven't mentioned and I'll try to see what range I would place them in.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Lopez above Barrera?
    Marquez in a top 100?
    Marciano in the top 20?

    Ouch.

    Michael Spinks. Where would you rank him, PHILLA, and why?
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    IMO Marquez deserves a place in the top 100 and one could argue that he is just as great as MAB and Morales but just didn't get his chance to tango.

    Finito Lopez one of the fighters who really got me hardcore into boxing (along with Barrera actually) I was absolutely amazed by his technical brilliance the first time i saw him fight and that was before i knew that he retired undefeated.

    Marciano a pretty small heavyweight who wrecked havoc on the division against other great albeit past prime fighters. IMO gets underrated by boxing fans because of his offensive style.

    Spinks i can't rate unfortunately don't know much about him.
     
  4. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I rate fighters not on what they could have done but what they did do, and Marquez has no case to being as high as either Barrera or Morales, two fighters who fought and better opposition in just as many weight divisions.

    Resume isn't a big criteria for you, then?

    His resume isn't top 20 level, his skills aren't top 20 level, and neither was his longevity. Why is he top 20?

    Sorry to hear that, PHILLA.

    How about Orlando Canizales?
     
  5. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    If you got around to actually doing a top 100 you'd see guys like Vitali, Calzaghe, Marquez cant fit in, its simply too difficult with all the great fighters over the years. Mosley and Tito are pusing it imo.
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    The only people who are qualified to make a credible top 100 list of fighters are those that have at least seen Michael Spinks. PHILLA hasn't. That isn't get on him, I'm not qualified either because I'm only getting my Vincente Saldivar education right now.
     
  7. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I rate them on what they did do also. Basically I rate them on what I see. Apart from SRR, who i put up on top based on consensus. All the other fighters is from footage that I've seen with my own eyes.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    I can see what you're getting at with the quantity of great fighters there are but though this list would surely stretch out, the order would remain pretty much the same.
     
  9. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    How about Orlando Canizales. PHILLA?

    A fighter who was every bit as dominant at Bantamweight as Lopez was at Minimumweight, but who had better fighters to contend with? Skillwise, Orlando has a strong case, I feel, for being rated on the same level if not higher than the great Finito Lopez?
     
  10. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,986
    18,238
    Jul 29, 2004
    Addie is right...you have to be careful how much stock you put into how good a fighter look in your opinion.

    It certainly counts but you have to really look at who they beat. So often fighters look the **** against a certain level of opponant then fall apart when they step up.
    Lopez was never really challenged because there was no one there to challenge him.

    Though not his fault he did miss out on fighting two of the best light flys of that era...which would have went a long way to justifying him over Barrera.

    Greb, Langford and Charles should make your top 10 for a start, then after that go for your life but dont forget Fitzsimmons who many people overlook. Possible top 10 but I reckon solid top 25 at the very least.
     
  11. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Had he faced and defeated Gonzalez and Carbajal, there would be no questions over his resume, and he'd be rated higher than Marco with absolutely no complaints from me. Whether or not he was capable doesn't matter, he just didn't do it.
     
  12. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    Were do Sam Langford, Orginal Walcott, George Dixon, Micky Walker, Marcel Cerdan, Barney Ross, Tony Canzoneri, Jimmy McLarin, Dick Tiger, Joe Gans, Gene Tunney, Thomas Hearns, Salvador Sanchez, rank in the list?
     
  13. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Pretty absurd listings there.
     
  14. PunchOut

    PunchOut Active Member Full Member

    1,236
    2
    Apr 26, 2009
    and then ... i stop to read
     
  15. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I watched Chavez vs LaPorte last night. He was brilliant. So calm, so relaxed, and he delivered punches beautifully to head and body.