Although I donm't agree with that, at the moment you are right. Froch probably is a little bitter, I mean it isn't often people get brutally KOed by boxers no ones heard of then a couple of fights later get a world title fight!
froch worked his way up to a world title the hard way and had his fights broadcast on BBC early in his career, khan won a silver medal at the age of 17 and captured the public eye which propelled him through the pro ranks, both fighters are frauds in different ways altough froch is a pritty laughable the man still talks himself up to be something great dispite coming off a controvertial home town decision against a unbeaten prospect, and soon after the fight he still continued the trash talk towards calzaghe froch is a wanker of the highest magnitude, as much as i'm skeptical of khan he has the potential of overshadowing froch's career
do u know what i find most funny about carl the ****er froch he congratulated david haye for his victory against valuev saying in his own words ''he did what he had to do to get the win in the guys backyard'' yet haye used the same tactics andre derell used against him but direll threw cleaner shots then haye and made froch look a bigger ammature then haye did with valuev how ironic
There is nothing easy about winning an Olympic medal at 17, Khan must have worked hard in his early years.
I don't see anything wrong with what Froch has said about Khan, I'd not go as far as to say that I concur 100% but there isn't anything that I, myself, would pull him over. The trouble with boxers is that they are exceptionally bad at accepting criticism - but what Froch has said isn't criticism, it's an honest (and largely accurate) observation. ''Glass jawed, mollycoddled fraud'' = criticism ''There will always be question marks over his chin until he faces a world class puncher'' = observation I'm not the biggest Khan fan, he comes across as a bit of an arse sometimes and talks so much ****, his fights are often pretty boring and he has had everything given to him in the pros. Froch meanwhile has worked his way through the ranks and won a world title against a world class opponent, and has defended it twice (regardless of performances etc) against two world class challengers. The fact that Froch might lose his next fight is a testament to his willingness to face the best opposition available in the division. Other than bullshitting to some know-nothing Sky Sports interviewer, has Khan ever suggested he is willing to do the same? Froch >>>> Khan
true,anyone who says differant,knows **** all,if ANYONE says khan is above froch,needs looking at,in the heed. oh faisal,shut it you ****wit:good
What is most hilarious about Froch's cynical, bitter remarks are the fact his friends bought the Khan pay-per-view and added to his 'lavish' lifestyle atsch
He gets his name in the papers (something he struggles with a lot of the time). I like both guys, but i dont see why Froch has to be knocking him. Who was he fighting after 4 years as a pro?