Paul Williams vs a prime Micheal Nunn

Nunn lol.

 

Nunn was too quick.

 

Nunn

 

2nd to Nunn EASILY, the fact that this is even in question shows how severly underrated Michael Nunn still is.

lmao, if he thought he fought a skilled, quick, southpaw in Sergio Martinez, what would he think about Michael Nunn!!!!?

 

Nunn would flatten him early at 160,

 

not an easy question but i tend to nunn by a close decision , not embarassment , the more massive and still the more proven against fighters closer to his own size.

 

maybe deck him early at 160 , and i say that only because the last fight of williams , and at a second thought also because nunn vs. kalambay but williams is no kalambay.

 

Nunn finishes him early, its quite simple nunn was far too skilled for a volume puncher like williams who only does 1 thing a prime nunn hit hard at 160 he was a complete fighter williams would'nt make it to the 3rd round
and yeah u'r right williams is levels below kalambay, kalambay was one of the most technically sound underrated fighters all time at 160, williams is possible 1 of the biggest technically flawed overrated fighters of the last 7 years

 

i agree that kalambay was technically superior to williams at least defensively , but when i said that williams is no kalambay i meant that he will not face the same physical disadvantage kalambay did . and coming to think about it , i think williams' chin is better than kalambay who was decked against kalule (154lbs fighter) , not only KOby1 against nunn.

 

That was a slip against Kalule.Bad call.

 

So everyone wants to pull some guy out of their ass that could beat Williams. No one really knows for sure. What I do know is that Williams' chin is far greater than anyone on this thread is givin him credit for.

 

It would be a fun fight to watch. Both guys threw a ton of punches in combination, only Nunn threw his correctly and was a middleweight.

 

The question is ridiculous. I like Paul Williams but he would have been KTFO. Nunn had that ATG ability.