Put these little guys in order of greatness.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Dec 10, 2009.


  1. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I wouldn't say so. I figure outside of Carbajal and possibly Gonzalez that Yuh loses to the top 108 pounders, whereas Moon had the ability to beat any of the top 115 pounders.
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    ...Based on his size and power, absolutely. Take away his god-given power and I don't think he would have been half the fighter he was. Yuh, in contrast, was so good because of all the things he learned in the gym. Power isn't something you truly develop through hard work and determination, you either hit hard or you don't. I guess I admire Yuh more because I figure he made more sacrifices during his development stages as a fighter. If I'm selling Moon short here, feel free to put me in my place. Myung had to be more consistent throughout a fight because he wasn't going to score a sudden knockout.

    I hate to make the comparison, but I liken these two fighters...very broadly...to a George Foreman and Chris Byrd. One fighter is great because of god-given things such as power, punch resistance, and physical stature. The other was effective because of things he learned in the gym, and had to be focused and consistent at all times because he knew most if not all of his fights would be determined on amount of punches landed rather than any one punch. It doesn't make Yuh a better and more effective fighter, but I think it rightly qualifies him as better technically at least.
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I'm pretty comfortable in ranking Foreman ahead of Byrd.;)

    I think Moon was just a physical monster. Not only crushing power, but undeniable will, stamina, and durability. A very hard mixture to beat when you take into account his extremely unorthodox punching style and relentless offense. Whether or not you respect those attributes in comparison to learned technical acumen is irrelevant to whether or not they were as effective in the ring, which they clearly were at least in his case and the case of quite a few others.
     
  4. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    I doubt anyone would argue against Yuh being better technically than Moon.

    Moon was the worst of all the high profile Korean fighters,-possibly even the worst of all the top asian fighters -from a technical perspective.He's a bit like the Marciano of asian boxing.
     
  5. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    Absolutely. :good

    I usually base my rankings on resume and longevity mainly, but I do have to make an exception here. It don't feel right ranking Moon over Yuh. I view one fighter as being a talentless brawler who just happens to have iron fists, and the other a very smart, intelligent technical boxer, who could fight effectively inside and outside.

    This conversation may go on, but before it does, recommend a fight of Moon's. Preferably his greatest ever showing that's available on the Internet? I've seen his first fight with Galaxy.
     
  6. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    And Rocky Marciano will never ever be on my radar. :bart No disrespect to all you fans of The Rock, I'm just partial to the more talented fighters...who I think represent the sport the way it was supposed to be represented.
     
  7. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    I can sympathise there.Not a huge fan of unskilled toilers myself, even the huge punching or otherwise truly elite ones.

    But you have to seperate that from their inherent effectriveness as fighters.
     
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    :? Do I really have too?
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    tell me what you think about it

    Similar to mine

    Chang
    Lopez
    Gushiken
    Zapata
    Roman
    Moon
    Yuh
    Gonzalez
    Carbajal

    Actually i think Lopez had a good punching style to trouble Chang as long, hard, straight, textbook shots did trouble Chang at times. But i also think Chang has a good style to beat Lopez's overrall style.

    Also, Chang dosent worry about styles he is a style breaker.

    Interesting one but i have always seen Chang just being too relelntless and can take the iniative from Gushiken and not give him a chance to get set and allow Chang to swarm all over him as i think Gushiken needs to be in controll of a fight.

    Well if you take it away its not really Moon then is it. That is part of him like it or lump it it makes him good fighter but he knows how to use it so surely thats a skill.
     
  10. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I'm not aware of whether or not you read all the posts in the discussion, but the point I was making is that Moon is effective based mainly on god-given traits. Your an amateur Greg, and maybe one day you'll get in the ring with someone who couldn't hold your jockstrap in all of the departments you worked on in the gym. Then you get in the ring with him and he knocks you out with a wild clubbing shot, despite you being more talented at Boxing. I liken that scenario to this one. I concede that Moon's power made him very effective, and that he'd probably beat Yuh based on his size and power...but I appreciate Yuh's skills more.
     
  11. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Moon's destruction of a faded Roman is up on Youtube, though it doesn't really give too much sense of what a prime for prime bout between the two would've been like. I'd probably have favored Moon there as well, though. Roman was always just a bit too small I think to handle Moon's power and aggression. I could be wrong, though.

    Both of his fights with Konadu used to be up. Now only the first bout is, albeit in pretty poor quality. Great fight though. The rematch was just a blow-out for Moon.

    His blitzing of Ernesto Ford is another good one to watch that's available (again though, the quality is pretty damn poor). Noone is going to claim Moon was any kind of technical savant, or a particularly pleasing fighter to the eye. But the guy was undeniably very effective with the tools he brought to the table. An iron fist, a granite chin, relentless aggression, unbreakable will, and a high workrate of unorthodox punching is always going ot be tough to beat regardless of the opponent's technical prowess.
     
  12. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    i understand its annoying when theres fighters like that but they need to learn how to use that talent they have been given to make it effective. Your not telling me really Moon had no skill of course he did his skill was being able to maximise his god given talent.
     
  13. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    If Moon really wanted to maximize his god given talent, I'd have expected him to throw with sharper technique and have a wider array of shots at his disposable. I think he had it easy in comparison to Yuh.
     
  14. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008

    Don't understand this to be honest.

    Moon faced a higher calibre of opponent.

    Also, just because he didn't focus so much on technique, doesn't mean it's 'easy' to swing like he did for as long as he could, take the punches he could and most importantly BEAT some very good fighters using the same style. Also, the fact he didn't have a massive amount of technical skill made it harder for him surely, because he could only do one thing but had to do it well, and ship punishment doing it.

    In short, as he was very one dimensional you think people could have figured out a gameplan to beat him? Not really, he would just walk through everything.

    Kaokor beat him really well, but as has already been noted Moons trainer died the night before the fight. He was not as there as me might've been, although Kaokor to his credit put on a masterful display against a stubborn opponent.

    I think Moon is quality, regardless of him not having many nuances and streamlined technical aspects, he cut off the ring well, was resiliant, hard to beat and ferocious.

    I hold all effective fighters in high regard regardless of style.
     
  15. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    But he did his job effectivly though didnt he?

    his skills is landing on his opponent, getting your feet planted correctly, getting power in his shots.

    He was a good fighter due to his talent but for talent to be effective it has to be used well and he used it well he was aggresive and kept a high pace.