Jim Driscoll vs Naseem Hamed

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flea Man, Dec 14, 2009.


  1. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    12 rounds; 126 lbs.

    Two British Feathers, both had power (Naz has the bigger punch judging by the footage I've seen, which is obviously much more of The Prince) and both had awkward styles, Driscolls was primarily awkward due to the era he fought in/gloves he wore (I assume) although he doesn't seem to hold back on the punches he's throwing here. Both are also very short.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LSDYJOFp7Q[/ame]

    So, would Driscolls gloves allow him to dent Naz's chin like we've never seen before? Would Hamed's bad balance finally be the undoing of him? Or would Driscoll find it hard to land his shots on Naz, who in his prime had an awkward elusiveness to add to his awesome two-fisted power.

    For me, Naz is too hittable to get through unscatched. Seeing as I'm much more familiar with Naz I'm tempted to say he wins on poitns in an unforgettable clash.
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Oc38rNMj8s[/ame]
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    now people might knock me but i seriously just think driscoll's hands and feet are too busy to enale naseem to counter, driscoll is a true master boxer, not the greatest match-up for naz
     
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
  4. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,428
    3,948
    Jun 28, 2009
    I posted this in a Driscoll-Hamed thread not too long ago.

    ''Two potential outcomes here: Hamed fights flat-footed and power-reliant as he did under Steward/Suarez, and Driscoll schools him; or, Hamed of the Ingle days fights up on his toes, bouncing about unpredictably looking to land those unorthodox, lethal counters that were generated from his legs with real power, and Driscoll schools hims.''

    It was a bit of an overstatement, but I'll stand by the general gist. Driscoll is one of the old timers who looks genuinely good to my eye, and while matching up two men from two such differing respective eras would be pointless much of the time, it isn't here IMO. If we coalesce the impressive available footage of Driscoll with his overall ledger, it suggests to me that he had both the style and substance to exploit most of the holes in Hamed's armour. If Driscoll could handle the varying likes of Dixon, Attell, Moran, Welsh and Bowker, I'd venture to say that he could handle the unorthodoxy of Hamed (though not without clear and present danger).
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    I agree that Driscoll appears to have a style that would have worked against more 'modern' fighters.
     
  6. AMBOY

    AMBOY New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    Its gotta be Naz in this one, one of if not the hardest punching featherweight in history, and that unorthadox stlye would of given Driscoll nightmares... :bbb
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    You think? Based on what? Driscoll seems pretty versatile, and if anything I think he could give Naz just as many problems.

    I see Nazs chin keeping him in this one and him throwing enough quality shots and staying at mid-range clowning enough to stifle the Welshmans obvious (judging by the above footage) workrate and ferocity.

    I see no arguments either way and can definitely see Nazs style causing Driscoll problems, but not as clear cut as you put it mate.
     
  8. AMBOY

    AMBOY New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    Based on Naz knocked out every one he fought bar a handfull of opponents, he took a great shot also, if i was a betting man my money would go on Naz..
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah I don't think you really know what you're talking about.
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    nailed it

    Driscoll is pue quality one of the most impressive bits of fottage i have ever seen
     
  11. AMBOY

    AMBOY New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    What..?? did you go to all of Driscolls fights,, you posted the question you moron, no need to be rude if you dont agree with someones answer, who the **** do you think you are mr ****in boxing....:nono
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    271
    Jul 22, 2004
    TIMBAAAAA Naz makes short work of the straight up boxer in 1 or 2 rounds, Driscols chin is up in the air for the taking, dont get misled by the sped up film, plus he has little in the way of lateral movement
     
  13. AMBOY

    AMBOY New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    Without doubt - :bbb
     
  14. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    402
    Jun 14, 2006
    :lol:

    Precisely why I've not commented, I know **** all all about Jim Driscoll.
     
  15. AMBOY

    AMBOY New Member Full Member

    96
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    He couldn't of gone any further back if he tried..