Is Mexico losing Talent, JMM is the only elite mexican boxer today!!!

A homosexual like you is calling me a clown?

Mention a controversial Pacquiao win please. The Marquez rematch?, you must be a real piece of **** if you think a close fight that could go either way is controversial.

And please don't bring up the moderating part, because even in a discussion like that you would see yourself looking like a homosexual ******, discussing this is your best bet jackass.

 

If I didn't know my stuff I wouldn't be discussing. Chavez took that fight because he wanted to and moving up in weight shouldn't be an issue, isn't he rated an ATG top 10 or something ridiculous like that?, isn't moving up and winning what ATGs do?, so he moved up a division and looked terrible because of the weight of because of Whitaker's boxing ability?, serious question there to see if YOU know your stuff.

Whitaker made him look like he really is due to his boxing ability and style, a one dimensional fighter lost and confused yet got a DRAW to save face, that draw is probably one of the worst robberies ever and Chavez has been in far too many robberies and controversial fights for an ATG. You put him in there against the cabdrivers he feasted on and he will look like Tyson, put him there against a skilled opponent and you will see how he struggles.

In this case it's his opponent NOT his weight. Didn't he fight yet another, out of the 100, tomato cans after that fight in the same division and won?

 

I agree that Sweet Pea outclassed Chavez. :bbb

Man I miss Pernell!

 

A real ATG with real ATG abilities right there, definitely not a heavybag in boxing trunks.

 

:good

I am not anti-Chavez by any means; he was very good for the sport and entertaining.

However, that draw against Sweet Pea was an absolute sin.

 

Yup. :happy

 

scar hating on mexicans.....wow, i'm surprised...that camel ****er is just mad that besides camel jockey's, his country hasn't produced absolute **** in boxing.....scar wouldn't even be qualified to check chavez's cup before a fight, he wouldn't even be allowed to clean the spit out of the spit bucket.....

 

both marquez fights were controversial you ass face....it's hard for you to see that though since you were to busy looking at pac's nutz....it's funny how scar dont know **** about boxing, yet decided to root for manny pac and floyd mayweather....haahahahahahahahahahahahaha....he's like all them "new steelers fans" in football this year.......

 

Freddy,

I don't know Scar's history on Mexican fighters, but he's spot on with respect to Chavez and Sweet Pea.

One (Whitaker) was a bonafide ATG and the other, Chavez, was an excellent fighter who falls short of that criteria in my opinion.

 

nobody disputes that...but he acts as if the fought a prime chavez...scar dont know **** about chavez which is why he shouldn't open his dick sucking lips when it comes down to a man like chavez......how come scar dont mention how there were talks of chavez vs whitaker when chavez was gonna move up to 140......but noooooooooooooo sweet pea decided to let his great friend taylor in there first and fed him to the lion.....chavez vs whitaker was a clear victory for whitaker, but not a great one....if people love that style of boxing, that's great...but they gotta understand that they're in the minority.......

 

First Marquez fight belonged to Pac, the female judge that scored the first round 10-7 rather than 10-6 is what made it a draw and she admitted she made a mistake so it goes in favor of Pacquiao. Still I insist, close fights remain close fights regardless of who I thought won or you did, a controversial fight is Chavez/Whitaker, go watch it again fatso.

 

You know, if all human beings looked like you then I would **** camels for sure.

 

Freddy,

A prime Chavez still loses to Sweet Pea.

As for Taylor, he had outfought Chavez and had the fight won before the KO. All the credit in the world to Chavez for landing the harder shots that fight-- including the KO punch-- but had the fight gone to the cards, he likely would have lost.

 

who??? mayweather cuz JMM is known as the best for his 15 rds he won over pac

 

just cause the judge admitted that don't mean they didn't steal rounds from marquez.......and since you're so concerned about what judges say, why dont you bring up the fact that franz martti and mickey vann both said that their draws were justified due to pernell not wanting to fight and just wanting to survive.......they were not impressed with pernell in that fight at all, as many weren't....pernell was a great, great fighter...but on that night he didn't whooooop chavez, he played it safe and thought he'd bank on the judges giving him the fight