is joe frazier really a top 8 ATG heavyweight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HEADBANGER, Dec 15, 2009.


  1. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    1st of all, frazier handing ali his 1st defeat is one of the greatest wins any fighter could have on his record. but when you look at the rest of joes best victories, does he really deserve to be ranked so high in so many peoples ATG heavyweight lists :think

    btw, this is not a dig at frazier, its an open discussion wanted by people who know more about this than i do.

    cheers :thumbsup
     
  2. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    Well i honestly think so, yes. He had the potential to become one of the top 3-5 ever if he had not ran into Foreman. I mean, Bonavena, Machen, Chuvalo, Mathis, Quarry, Zyglewicz, Ellis, Foster, Bugner and ofcourse Ali. No suckers. All good wins, with 1-3 being great.
     
  3. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    **** yes.

    Prime Ali
    Quarry
    Bonavena x2
    Ellis
    Destroyed Foster
    Machen
    Chuvalo
    Doug Jones
    Bugner

    That isn't a half bad resumé at all.

    Greatest HW win of all-time over a prime Ali.
    ATG pressure fighter, a nightmare H2H for a lot of guys.
    And all this despite barely tipping the 200 mark, at 5'11½", and being one-handed and partially blind in one eye.
     
  4. Hadrian

    Hadrian Member Full Member

    445
    4
    Jun 28, 2007
    yeah win1 vs a prime and undefeated ali was the greatest hw win ever--i totally agree

    and let's not forget that his loss in thrill-manilla is one of the greatest performances by a hw ever also--he beat the hell out of ali in that fight

    his other wins are very impressive too and if it weren't for his terrible match-up issues with big george i'd have him top 3-5 hws...as it is he's a definate top 10
     
  5. CharlieGarbs

    CharlieGarbs Guest

    Yes, Joe Frazier is the man.
     
  6. london2k

    london2k Guest

    I've always thought very highly of Frazier. A real stand up guy, and a very good fighter. But at his size, which was really only a Cruiser, I don't think he'd have a prayer in the modern era of huge HWs.

    A guy weighing 205 pounds fighting Lewis, or either of the K brothers? It would be "Down goes Frasssia" all over again.
     
  7. M.I.G.

    M.I.G. and STILL... Full Member

    1,524
    0
    Apr 22, 2006
  8. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    The heavyweights of today are just to damn big for guys like Quarry and Bonavena to deal with, but make no mistake, pound for pound the 2nd tier fighters of Frazier's era were better boxers than most modern heavyweights. Quarry was fast and very skilled. Bonavena was one tough sob, and had good skills. Frazier is a long way from being a one hit wonder.
     
  9. HitBattousai

    HitBattousai Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,076
    11
    May 6, 2006
    Frazier never fought prime Ali. However, his win against not prime Ali was still a great win, and his resume otherwise is easily good enough for top eight at Heavyweight all-time.
     
  10. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Actually i have him 9 0r 10 on my list but,I wouldnt argue with anyone that put him 8th.
     
  11. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009




    i'm not so sure about the quality of those victories at all

    bonevena was a good win

    bob foster - good win but was a pumped up light heavy who had lost 4 times before he fought joe

    mathis - looks a decent scalp though he was undefeated at the time against limited opposition. joe won a majority decision

    quarry - from the fights i've seen him in he looked very limited fighter, he'd already lost 2 and drawn 4 when joe faced him

    chuvalo - had lost 13 when joe faced him

    ellis - had lost 5 by the time joe faced him

    bugner - extremely average heavyweight who had lost 5 by the time joe faced him



    i appreciate i have a degree of ignorance about this because i wasn't around to watch joe at the time, but apart from his great win v ali, it seems to me that he doesn't have 2 much else on his record and in hindsight his ATG status in history is over-rated.
     
  12. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    bump

    c'mon some of you must know more than me on this.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,033
    48,151
    Mar 21, 2007
  14. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    No offence mate, but this is what it comes down to. All you are doing is trundling though Boxrec looking at how many fights each guy lost, and it doesn't tell the whole story.

    For example, Foster lost early on to solid contenders like Doug Jones - who gave Ali one of his toughest nights - Zora Folley & Ernie Terrell, before he became the fighter he was. And it was Joe's destructive performance more than anything.

    Chuvalo had lost 13 times yes, but it was again the perforance. Joe left him battered, bruised and uncharacteristically hurt as he stopped Chuvalo - albeit on his feet - and Chuvalo had an ATG chin and regularly went the distance, not even George Foreman did that much damage to Chuvalo despite landing about 20 clean punches down the barrell with Chuvalo up against the ropes trying to defend himself.

    Quarry had lost a couple yes, but that was against Patterson & Ellis. He was a good puncher and a solid fighter, he struggled mainly with upright boxers like Machen or Ali, stylistically he matched up better against Joe but Frazier beat him in 5.

    *PS - Frazier stopped Mathis in 11, it wasn't a majority decision. The only other guy to do so was the hard-hitting Ron Lyle at the end of Mathis' career. He wasn't great though, I'll admit.

    I believe Ali was prime. Some may say his best showing and his true prime was the Cleveland Williams fight, others will say his prime would of been during the 3 years off his exile. We have no way of telling. Ali looked his usual self in that FOTC, and was it was as close to a prime Ali as we ever saw. I take nothing away from Frazier whatsoever.

    There's a thread on the Classic called something like 'Joe Frazier vs Superheavyweights' if you'd like to debate it. There's a lot of valid points in that thread and some interesting discussion. I disagree entirely with you though if I'm honest. Frazier was strong, full of heart, difficult to tag cleanly, and closed the distance excellently, and had the power to hurt anybody. Neither Lewis or the Klitschko brothers could do what Foreman did in standing up to him, dropping their hands and delivering great power from low uppercuts like Foreman.

    Besides, if we are basing it on the Foreman showing, that wasn't a prime Frazier. And Ali had Super-Heavy dimensions to an extent. 6'3" with an 80" reach and he tried to utilise that. Not to mention the quick hands, quick feet, jab, 1-2, timing, durability and heart. And Frazier beat him prime-for-prime.

    :smoke
     
  15. randeris

    randeris Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,339
    0
    Nov 20, 2007
    the number of losses hardly determine the quality of a fighter.