If clinching even once got you DQ'd. Which boxers would be the best ever?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Babality, Dec 16, 2009.

Page 1 of 2
  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    29,298
    Likes Received:
    15,145
    Ruiz aside? :good
    Pac, Morales... keep going.
     
    Babality, Dec 16, 2009
    #1
  2. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2005
    Messages:
    13,028
    Likes Received:
    14
    88 Tyson
     
    TheGreat, Dec 16, 2009
    #2
  3. J.R.

    J.R. No Mames Guey Full Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2008
    Messages:
    15,033
    Likes Received:
    5
    Frazier, Tyson, Liston, Foreman.
     
    J.R., Dec 16, 2009
    #3
  4. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    391
    You mean as far as causing guys to clinch? You have to be clear about these things...
     
    mrtony80, Dec 16, 2009
    #4
  5. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    29,298
    Likes Received:
    15,145
    No. Just no clinching.
     
    Babality, Dec 16, 2009
    #5
  6. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    391
    I still don't get what you are saying...you listed Pac and Morales...they aren't known for clinching...
     
    mrtony80, Dec 16, 2009
    #6
  7. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2008
    Messages:
    29,298
    Likes Received:
    15,145
    ...

    That's my point. Maybe the Ruiz joke confused you? :good

    What the title says. What fighters would be the most successful if clinching was absolutely not allowed AT ALL.
     
    Babality, Dec 16, 2009
    #7
  8. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,735
    Likes Received:
    15
    if clinching was not allowed at all muhamid ali would have 20 losses on his record
     
    CottoDaBodykill, Dec 16, 2009
    #8
  9. mrtony80

    mrtony80 Likes thick chicks Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2009
    Messages:
    8,114
    Likes Received:
    391
    Ok...now I see...still, hard to say. Tough question.
     
    mrtony80, Dec 16, 2009
    #9
  10. herbzg

    herbzg Euro-Level Athlete Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,826
    Likes Received:
    170
    andre dirrell
     
    herbzg, Dec 16, 2009
    #10
  11. Tricks77

    Tricks77 Sergio By God Martinez Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    5
    Cotto. The man won't clinch even if he's getting the beating of his life. That's probably half the reason why he took so much damage from Pacquiao and Margarito.
     
    Tricks77, Dec 16, 2009
    #11
  12. Fan88

    Fan88 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,823
    Likes Received:
    1

    Most of the Mexicans, Pac, prime Tyson.
     
    Fan88, Dec 16, 2009
    #12
  13. VARG

    VARG Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    8,005
    Likes Received:
    0
    Berto wouldnt have a career
    Mosley would've never beaten Margarito
    And Cotto might've possibly been dropped much sooner in his career
     
    VARG, Dec 16, 2009
    #13
  14. CottoDaBodykill

    CottoDaBodykill Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    6,735
    Likes Received:
    15
    lmao mosley would've never beaten margarito .. lmao sour puss
     
    CottoDaBodykill, Dec 16, 2009
    #14
  15. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,257
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ricky Hatton :D
     
    hmi, Dec 16, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2