Why did the old timers have their hands so low?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by CharlieGarbs, Dec 23, 2009.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    260
    Jul 22, 2004
    No its not hard to block a shot when you have your hands up, its far far easier to manouver your hands to parry if your hands are up than if they are down, you have to move them around 3 inches as opposed to 3 feet. Saying its harder to parry with your hands up is LAUGHABLE TO THE EXTREME. I suppose the likes of Duran were really **** at parrying too right? Posting a pic of a weight drained DLH getting tagged proves nothing, he never had much defensive skill in the first place

    And whos talking about keeping the gloves/guard in a stationary position? Movement from the hips/waist/shoulder is the ideal

    As for older timers focusing on evasive movement. SO why don't they have good lateral movement? They go back and forwards in straight lines, which is another big no no. Where is the evasive movement on par with the likes of Whitaker, Ray Leonard, ALi, Pep? Also why is the footwork so straight up with a lack of shift of bodyweight from 1 side to the other?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,195
    46,436
    Mar 21, 2007
    I think part of your problem here is this insistance on direct comparison. Because i'm saying dynamic parrying was something that old-timers were good at you are insisting that I must think that Duran was ****. Nothing could be further from the truth.

    Showing De La Hoya getting tagged is an example of what I was talking about when I posted that picture - that where a difference in speed exists it's easy to split a modern guard even when using the modern gloves. Given the difference in the size of older gloves (33-50% depending) you can see why it would be easier to split the "modern" technical guard whilst wearing such gloves, surely? Smaller gap needed, smaller area covered.

    Saying it's harder to parry with your hands up IS laughable in the extreme. Luckily, i've never said that. What i've said is parrying shots from a static guard is harder.

    I agree with you. Very important to parry incoming blows in this situation AND not to give to much ground (See Fitz).
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,200
    28,138
    Jun 2, 2006
    Would that not be because they also have to block leg and foot shots ?
    I don't watch much MMA ,or whatever its called, but from what I have seen their punching technique is horrible, I would not bring them into the equation.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,195
    46,436
    Mar 21, 2007

    Their punching IS coming on, but yeah, it's still not great. The guys who can really punch with proper technique are very noticable, put it that way. Part of this is because of the amount of space available in the ring. Also, over-commiting is very dangerous because balance is at an absolute premium as far as take-downs are concerned.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,200
    28,138
    Jun 2, 2006
    Your theory about overcommiting seems logical,as the penalty for missing is potentially much more severe ,I should think.
    That huge Pole, Pozdainowski ,whatever, he is called, built like Hercules ,punches like my girl friend,they dont turn their hands over ,must have been taught by Calzaghe.
     
  6. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    277
    Oct 4, 2005
    This is true. Well, when placed within the right context. I mean, i'm sure a lower guard worked better with the boxing rules as they were in 1900, which is COMPLETELY different from what they were in 1930. It took some time for boxers, heavyweights especially, to evolve.
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,815
    13,406
    Jun 30, 2005
    Pudzianowski is a strongman who just fought his first fight in MMA. He does not in any way, shape, or form represent typical mixed martial artists.

    That being said, you're right.
     
  8. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,231
    1,016
    Sep 10, 2005
    It's a bit deeper than that.

    There was much more emphasis on the 'lean', a move associated with Corbett and Johnson to make your man over-reach, which Ali would later popularize.

    With lighter gloves, punches to the head were generally less concussive whereas a blow in the gut would really sink in and when you’ve got 20-45 rounds to play around with you’re gonna’ make damn sure you don’t cop many down there.

    Activity levels were generally lower because the consequences of getting punched could be far deadlier. Go and have a spar with some bag gloves and you’ll find your self not as willing to hang about in the ‘pocket’ and instead assume a more open glove, distant stance.

    To contrast the old timer’s methods against the fellows of today and come to blunt conclusions is akin to throwing a Neanderthal in a pool and asking why it does not swim as well. It was a different ball game.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    The gloves were smaller so a blow to the body is worse than a head shot - we all agree on this

    If you have smaller gloves and bring your hands up it is very hard to protect your head as you are basically halfing the area of your defence as your gloves are smaller so less defensive coverage and the opponents gloves are smaller so less area of oncoming opponents blows to block away, so more shots would get through.

    So a high right hand taht floated around the chin and a left arm that was low to protect the body was the most commonly used guard. I dont think you can disagree here as it is shown in film that the right hand stayed fairly high.

    The right hand was set in the perfect place for parrying as it was loose and quickly able to parry a shot, now a parry is different from a block which is used now adays when fighters keep both of there hands up and tend to just put there glove in front of the oncoming glove, a parry knocks the arm away and leaves the person punching off balance due to the shift of there force making them unable to follow up with any more shots - if done correctly.

    A parry when both hands are held high generally lacks the strength to alter your opponents line of projectory in their punch enough to throw them off balance and is more just a temporary defence and purely defensive instead of being used for counter attacks.

    Also when both hands are held high you are left to guard your body with your elbows and they are quite thin and dont cover too much area and this is amplified with littler gloves that are harder to deflect so instead the left hand was used to cover the body more fully than the elbows or used to parry the oncoming shots (and therefor causing the same effect as a parried head shot but also sets up a brillaint right hand counter), whereas with bigger gloves there is more chance they just hit your elbows and they dont hurt as much when you get hit by them.

    But guys were fighting say every month at least in those days in the gym sparring at least once a week (normaly) so of course they would develop the most effective style to use there hardly going to go against all your insticnts and use a defence that does not work to protect themselves are they?

    And also there was elements of keeping your hands up in play as cross_trainer has pointed out.

    Also does anyone not think that the use of a high guard corrolates with the use of bigger gloves? In other words do you think Winky Wright would have been effective in the 1910's with his high guard?
     
  10. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    Interesting thread this one.
     
    louis54 likes this.
  11. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    3
    Sep 29, 2007
    In what way do top MMA fighters use 'high guards'? They don't stand with their hands behind their back, but they certainly don't use what in boxing would be called a high guard; it simply doesn't work with 4oz gloves.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,200
    28,138
    Jun 2, 2006
    I appreciate he is a debutee,I used him as an example ,because to be honest he was fresh in my mind ,and I don't generally watch MMA, so I would have been scratching for another name.
    I didn't intend any slight on MMA fighters who are undoubtedly very tough men ,just not usually that technically good at throwing punches ,imo.
     
  13. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    3
    Sep 29, 2007
    Because you're used to watching boxing and are applying the same standards to a completely different sport. You can't block punches with gloves, you can't stand sideways because it compromises your balance so much, the jab often becomes useless unless you have a 16" height and reach advantage because kicks have a much longer range, you can't throw a punch and clinch and expect the referee to restart the fight on the outside. I know you said you don't know much about MMA, but I suspect you're doing the same thing with the old timers; applying rules and standards from modern boxing that are completely irrelevant.
     
  14. Chaney

    Chaney Mystery and Imagination Full Member

    518
    9
    Sep 20, 2006
    Didn't Ali and Holmes often keep their hands low?
     
  15. Gesta

    Gesta Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,975
    9
    Apr 12, 2009
    You make alot of sense Greg.