Blood Test in January, February and March

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by puga_ni_nana, Dec 24, 2009.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    Arum suggested as a compromise so that this fight would be saved that along with the random urinalysis anytime, they could take the blood test on the following set of dates.
    This content is protected


    so basically, the blood test will cover all the months leading up to fight, January, February and March. Urine test is anytime and random. we have some studies that almost all steroids are currently detectable by urinalysis and the blood test is just for detecting HGH. i'm sure these 3 test in each month would pick this up. Is this a fair compromise by arum?
     
  2. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
  3. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    Watch the mayweather demand another thing.
     
  4. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
  5. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    The more testing the better I say. Guys are still getting popped, so they obviously can beat the current testing more often than not, otherwise they wouldn't try.
     
  6. jasbar

    jasbar Member Full Member

    376
    0
    Aug 15, 2009
    Its enough but how can we be sure that the results would not be doctored.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i would like to know the reason of those who thinks that it is not enough? i think this is a fair compromise from arum. All months would be tested. is this not covered enough for floyd?
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so how many time do you think is enough, every week? 2x a month? this would be hell too taxing since this is blood testing we are talking. they can get an number of urine test but blood test i don't know. besides isn't the dates of the blood testing spaced enough?
     
  9. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
    What about the semen test? - ellerbe? :)
     
  10. Chris85

    Chris85 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,140
    1
    May 6, 2009
    What difference does it make if you test for blood 100 times or 1 time if their system cant detect the illegal subtance to begin with.

    It will still come back negative regardless of the numbers.
     
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    this is all a different matter. if we don't trust the system then why bother?
     
  12. T.C.W

    T.C.W Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,936
    1,163
    Jul 20, 2004
    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  13. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    More tests + better tests = better detection. That's what they're asking for here...More tests and better tests.
     
  14. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    The current system is clearly inferior to the Olympic system.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    that answer was in reference to the other guy who put in doubt the system never mind if its the current or the olympic standard. any system can be tampered with.