This is the fight that is being used as "proof" that a blood test too close to the fight would weeken Manny Pacquiao. Dose anyone besides me think it is possible that Erik Morales won because he is acatuly a good boxer? That the reason that pacquiao couldn't stop Morales was because he had a solid chin having never been stopped in 49 previous bouts? Just wondering?
Manny first excuse for losing this fight was glove he and Roach personally blamed Pac first promoter Murad Muhammad for failing to get the glove pac wanted which were Reyes Gloves as a result Pac old promoter was fired and Arum was hired . There excuse back then had nothing to do with Blood. Why are they lying do they think no one is going to remember ?
Cut over the eye is bull**** gentlemen, Morales had one last great performance and his experience beat Pac fairly, Pac improved because of it. Pac fans claiming the butt are childish, what about when Pac butted Marquez Barerra etc ????
This is his second excuse this was not his first excuse for losing to morales because they fired Murad Muhammad for doing such a poor negotiation for the gloves manny wanted.
He lost because blood was taking from him 2 days prior to the fight. Since then, he has NEVER lost a fight in which blood was taken 2 days before a fight so therefor we can equate taking blood 2 days before a fight DOES effect him mentally. There should be no blood tests because of this.
Exactly, and he Brutally defeated Morales in the rematch and the 3rd fight proving the lost to Morales in the 1st fight was a fluke win because of the Gloves and Blood Issue but Mexicans won't agree especially Freddy Wak which I'm sure he will find excuses to discredit Pac wins over Morales by saying " AW MORALES IS SHOT BLABLA"