Loading a fight with restrictions is not taking on "all comers" it defeats the definition. Its taking on all comers under MY stipulations. Even Pac's biggest challenge moving up in weight against Cotto he had a requirement for the fight to be held at 145. Did Shane require anybody he fought to do this? Or Cotto? Like I said before.. Zab Judah took on all comers all though he lost majority of his big fights. Your definition of being a warrior seems to no be that good. A warrior dont ask for handicaps.
Michael gomez was and still is a warrior not a great but defo a warrior he would of fought a prime any1 no questions asked not just that he'd of wound them up and told them he was going 2 kill them also michael broadie was a warrior in the day in gin chi 1 and 2 especially the 1st one
Well i do agree with you on the weight issue, I think he has to cut that **** out and fight at the weight limit. I can see him asking for that when he first jumped from lightweight to Welter but I agree that his opponents should be able to come in at 147. If he is the Welter Champ then the fight should be at the Welter weight limit.
And what was your prediction for the DLH fight??? I'm not the biggest Pac fan but he was taking some tough chalanges.
Cotto comes to mind. When Pac was still rising, his choice of opposition was very gutsy too. Taking on Barrera, Marquez and Morales in a span of 16 months.
Ricky Hatton ducked nobody and consistently sought the best of his era. Miguel Cotto ducked nobody, and it has been his downfall. I also wonder are his only too defeats legit.
He ducked Marquez and should have tried to get a rematch with Barrera, but i think he knew hed get his ass kicked again!
But his ***** ass has refused to fight Paul Williams for two years now. He is automatically disqualified...
Ricky Hatton fought tyszu best at LW at the time, fought floyd, pac and would like rematches that is a warrior to me.