Paul Daley hit a few kicks, that jew looking fella smiled, then Paul Daley punched his ****ing head off. No racism btw, I love the jews, I would like to clarify this because the last time I mentioned them, I was banned for a long time because I said I loved the Jews, despite one of them getting KO'd in less than a minute by Amir Khan. *expects a ban* But I seriously love them, honestly. They're better than the Muslims. They ruined Eastenders.
i think your talking about when his trainer claimed he would become the first brit title holder in the ufc during the countdown show.
Probably. I'm a ****ing brit. I don't know what's going on, I'm told and I believe it. ...I should research your post but I suddenly lost interest and all I can see is typo's, alan patridge's voice, white text and
Damn, still can't believe that Hazelett decided to stand with Semtex. If Daley keeps facing guys that are stupid enough to stand with him in the UFC, he's going to have a lot of KO bonuses.
So who do you say Daley should face? I pick Koscheck, seen as that guy isn't in the ****ing 109 lineup.
Koscheck got injured and forced out of UFC 109. I am sure he'll fight Daley. Koscheck will actually be smart and take Daley down and win...
I wouldn't rule Kos out of trying to stand with Daley. Of course if Kos is smart enough to wrestle then he wins easily.
Daley wants to be the first UK UFC champ. Daley was a pound overweight and forfeits 10% of his purse. Hardy is the first bogus Brit to fight GSP for the belt first. Maybe then they will con people into think Daley is deserving when he is in the same division as power houses like Fitch, Alves and Koscheck.
You're being ott with your adjectives. Of course Hardy doesn't deserve a title shot (btw who does at this moment in time?) I thought he just about beat Davis, who deserved a rematch. But to refer to him as 'bogus' and a 'loser' (as you also referred to Bisping & Daley) is being unnecessarily reactionary. Who do you think deserves to fight GSP? The truth is there are no deserving contenders.
I'm calling them bogus and losers relatively speaking. If Kos avenges his loss to Thiago or Alves avenges his loss to Fitch or Fitch beats Alves again then one of those 3 begin to put themself in line for a shot. I know GSP has beaten them all but they are all more deserving. When I say bogus, I mean they are not the most deserving. When I say losers, I say that cos they have a tonne of losses and have yet to shown they are now on a completely different level. Both Daley and Hardy have shown they are good, better than what they were but not nearly on the level of Alves, Kos or Fitch. They are being hyped because they are Brits, can bang and are new names. Not the fairest reasons for them to get a shot really.
If. If 'Kos avenges his loss', if 'Fitch beats Alves again'; until the 'if's' are realised, Koscheck, Fitch & Alves are similarly 'bogus' challengers (admittedly still more deserving than Hardy). Whilst these fights are being scheduled, (they've not certain to be made), what would you like GSP to do? Twiddle his thumbs whilst Dana White struggles to unearth a worthy challenger? There aren't any, and won't be until the matches you proposed are made and the winners emerge. And even then GSP will dominate Fitch & Alves. Again. So the point being in the meantime Hardy will suffice as an opponent by way of default. And as regards labelling Bisping, Daley & Hardy losers because they have 'tonne(s) of losses', using this logic I suppose Couture, Belfort, Henderson, Wanderlei, Lidell, Ortiz, Pulver etc etc are all 'losers' considering they've all got 'tonne(s) of losses'. Losses at a elite level admittedly, but numerous losses all the same, so losers they are, right?
And furthermore how does Belfort beating Rich Franklin at a catchwweight of 195lbs deserve a title shot ahead of Marquardt or Henderson? Hardy isn't the first fighter to get an unmerited opportunity or even the least deserving to get a shot at a title, so why are you singling him out?
It doesn't and shouldn't. I've said in the past Henderson and Marquardt should get the shot. If you go through my posts, I'm sure you'll see that. However Belfort certainly has more clout than Hardy. If Hardy was a proven fighter and had a huge comeback win then I'd have no issue with that fight.
