iv never seen such a display of ***gotry by a 'fighter' like that before,the only rounds direll wasnt trying to give froch head were the rounds in which he was doing his seabiscuit impersonation,had he been training with tyson gay beforehand?? he was even holding froch's hand post fight,now i have nothing against this civil partnership stuff but leave it in the locker room fella's... exposed you *** where are you?
Really a display of how much better an inexperienced but good fighter is than a supposedly world class fighter like Froch who isnt good.
remind me never to watch a direll fight again in future,stop holding on and fecking fight you big girls blouse,direll won ****! except an invitation to a 'gaylords unite against facism' rally....
Dirrell has skill but he didn't cover himself in glory in my opinion. Froch was just as bad but at least forced the fight. At times Dirrell literally went down without even being touched.
Dirrell showed in parts that he could outclass Froch, but I didn't believe at the time that he showed it often enough for people to be screaming robbery, and I don't believe it now.
then try the last Vitali Klitschko fight. He fought against (what was his name again?) I thought Dirrel won, but the people that claim Froch won have a good point too. It was just a messy and close fight.
Close fight but it's impossible to give the belt to a man with no desire to fight. I thought a harsh ref could have disqualified Dirrell for the amount of holding and running he did. I appreciate good boxing but this wasn't it. Terrible fight and Froch did himself no favours. I did think he deserved the nod but only just. Dirrell should have had his purse withheld.
Dirrell schooled Froch's ass, but the running angered me too. Dirrell was getting the best of it whenever they went toe to toe, how can any real fighter run away when you are beating the other guy at practically everything.