Alan Minter v Chris Eubank

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Jan 5, 2010.


  1. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    You wipe the cum of your lips first because your still full of **** with **** all points nitpicking aside. It shows how weak the MW division was in comparison to the 80s/90s scene that those fighters rated top10, but lets face it they were good but nothing special, most of them Euro level gatekeepers, Hagler/Antuofermo aside. And Benn would knock the stuffing out of Antuofermo. And yes Thompson usually did put on 10-15lbs after weigh ins, thats well known in Manchester
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,753
    29,143
    Jun 2, 2006
    I see you didn't address the fact that Watson and Eubanks fought at 160lbs.
    How strong the middle weights were in different eras has jack **** relevance ,because Eubank DID NOT FIGHT THE BEST OF HIS ERA AT 160lbs.
    I showed you the opponents that Minter fought who were world rated.
    When you run out of words,which doesn't take long, you get abusive,which is very brave on a pc.
    You never had any credibilty with me as a poster, when you put up a top 10 feather weight list that doesnt include Sandy Saddler, you mug yourself .
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    First off you replied to my post ignoring my points and just spurting crap which is annoying. So yes you deserved some abuse and you'd get it face to face too.

    Second off, I did answer you, called nitpicking, because thats all the substance you've brought out. Do I rate Saddler compared to the other top FWs, no I dont that much, theres allot of quality featherweights. Unlike most of you never boxed types I've actually learnt and practised the sweet science to know who has skills and who doesnt. Do I give a toss about never boxed types rating me as a poster? No not really most people on this forum dont have a clue about boxing

    Eubank did fight some of the best of his era and better fighters than Antuofermo. The very best of his era? No Euro-US fights have always been hard to make though, and I dont hear you complain about other duckers quite the same
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,753
    29,143
    Jun 2, 2006
    This will be it for me,as you have anger issues that are pathetic in an adult.
    Never boxed ? I boxed ,off and on for over a decade.
    You dont need to practice the Sweet Science ,you need to practice some people science.
    I would guess I have more kos on my resume than you have had actual fights, but what the f**k,why would I need to educate you about my long past abilities, your opinion means jack **** to me.
    You bite when posters disagree with you, I've noticed it before.
    Well, plenty of them disagree with you on this thread.
    I suppose they are all under qualified to give an opinion ?

    Sandy Saddler retired as champion through injury.
    When he kod Pep in 4rds,it was only the second defeat Pep suffered in 136 fights.
    Among Sandy's victims were Pep ,3 out of 4.
    Terry Young ,Lulu Perez,Ray Famechon, plus 3 men who would hold the Light weight title.Demarco,Brown ,and Salas.
    He had 103 kos in 144 wins,and fought anywhere
    But what does that matter, you've had the gloves on,
    so you know best.
    Doc Bagley,Whitey Bimstein,Ray Arcel,Angelo Dundee, Chris Dundee, Jackie McCoy,Pop Foster,Harry Lenny,Billy GIbson , Benny Georgino.To name a few ,NEVER FOUGHT A DAY IN THEIR LIVES,so they must be ignorant too.
    Get real .:patsch
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    :|:|:| Sanchez would whoop his ass, but according to this forum Im racist and only rate black fighters, like Saddler :lol: I dont rate his Pep wins that high because I consider Pep past his prime, just like I dont rate Tarver that highly. And I dont rate quantity over quality

    I do have a bias to certain styles, ie fighters with skill and ability :yep
     
  6. ringsider

    ringsider Active Member Full Member

    1,454
    5
    Mar 11, 2009
    All this bickering because you guys want to think Minter was some kind of fighter.....:roll:eek:r Eubank for that matter.
     
  7. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    I'm not very familiar with Minter, but I do want to say that I agree that Eubank was one of the strongest men to ever fight at the weight.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,753
    29,143
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not a fan of either Minter of Eubanks, neither am I a fan of being sworn at because I disagree with some one,it's done and dusted now .

    FINIS
     
  9. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    eubank was strong and had one of the best chins of all time,but he could be lazy in his fights and i feel minter would have out-boxed him.minter too had an excellent chin and only once lost inside the distance without cuts stopping the fight
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,753
    29,143
    Jun 2, 2006
    This is certainly true,,he was ,and had a great chin ,but so did many other middleweights.Tiger,Fullmer,Valdez, Lamotta, etc.
    Even British 160 pounders might equal him for strength Turpin, and McCavoy, for example


    Eubanks actually seemed more vulnerable to the body,which is surprising, because he had a tremendous physique, and very strong abs.
     
  11. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    you're right on the body bit.as chins go he's up there with the best.
    :bartlooked good in a monacle too:bart
     
  12. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,195
    8,711
    Jul 17, 2009
    I remember being shocked that he lost to Sibson in that one.
     
  13. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    me too.my trainer said sibson would win and i thought.........**** off.
    mmmmmmmm
     
  14. essexboy

    essexboy The Cat Full Member

    4,063
    4
    Jul 12, 2009
    If you dont like them dont bother reading the posts and posting your own snide remarks here, they stepped in the ring so they deserve our respect and consideration. We cant keep talking about ATG's and comparing Hagler to Monzon we have to look at other fighters as well.

    Having said that, Eubank's blatant ducking is a disgrace to his own talents, he should have been fighting boxers like Toney, McCallum, Nunn or Kalambay, a win over any of those guys would see him have alot more respect from me at least. I cant understand it because I do believe he had the talent to hang with those guys but just refused. You cant duck all those names and call yourself 'Simply the Best' its just embaressing. Then again I am a Benn man myself. :yep
     
  15. Sayers

    Sayers Member Full Member

    156
    1
    Dec 28, 2009
    :good:good:good

    It is a shame I think he takes 1/3 in a series against any of them, and probably gets the better of one with Kalambay for me, and has a chance against a James Toney anything less than fully focused and in reasonable condition.