Haymon, Schaefer agreed to terms. Floyd declined!

That number is to get the case into federal court. This ain't in small claims for a reason ya know.

You can say a fighter won't issue an apology. That's just dandy, he'd rather make up lies, then make demands based on those lies, then drag an innocent man's image through the mud, then not apologize for the charade, and instead go through an expensive lawsuit and throw away a bigarse fight.

Makes perfect sense.

 

LOL
hahahaha.... oh the irony.

 

i bet he'll even apologize for fraud publicly..:rofl

 

:rofl

Floyd Sr: Little Floyd! Don't listen to em Mang! Day lyin! Who knows wut dat joke coach Roach got 'm on!"

Uncle Roger: Scientist my azz. Lemme ask you sumthin mistah science. You thank you know boxin? What part of the country has the best boxaz?.....

 

Make up what lies? How do we know PAcquiaos not on steroids? Did he take the tests?

Floyd can fight Shane. A GBP fighter and make nearly as much money. Pacquiao is now most likely frozen from facing an GBP fighters. So I hope he enjoys is bout with the weakest 154lb champ at a sure catchweight, while Floyd and Shane gets to fight for real money.

In terms of PAcquiaos image. How many of the hookers he banged will step forward asking for child support after he becomes president of manila?

 

Why Commencing A Defamation Action Is Not Aways A Good Idea

While people who are targeted by lies may well be angry enough to file a lawsuit, there are some very good reasons why actions for defamation may not be a good idea.
The publicity that results from a defamation lawsuit can create a greater audience for the false statements than they previously enjoyed. For example, if a newspaper or news show picks up the story of the lawsuit, false accusations that were previously known to only a small number of people may suddenly become known to the entire community, nation, or even to the world. As the media is much more apt to cover a lawsuit than to cover its ultimate resolution, the net effect may be that large numbers of people hear the false allegations, but never learn how the litigation was resolved.

This content is protected

As a result, it is unusual for attorneys to be willing to take defamation cases on a contingent fee basis,

This content is protected

Another significant concern is that, even where the statements made by the defendant are entirely false, it may not be possible for a plaintiff to prove all of the elements of defamation.

This content is protected

In other words, the plaintiff in a defamation action may be required to expend a considerable amount of money to bring the action, may experience significant negative publicity which repeats the false accusations,

This content is protected

While many plaintiffs will be able to successfully prosecute defamation actions, the possible downside should be considered when deciding whether or not such litigation should be attempted.

http://www.expertlaw.com/library/personal_injury/defamation.html

Otherwise, he would do himself a bigger favor by just taking random testing......instead of letting the accusations run wild in the media, and in court....pretty simple...costing himself money, time, and his reputation...

 

Christ ***** don't go all lawyer expert on us again, ad nauseum.

 

Google search box
"why defamation cases are stupid"
"how easy it is to hide steroids"

LOOK WHAT I FOUND!!!

 

Floyd is in quicksand up to his chin I cant imagine how he can get himself out of this one.

 

he can but he won't and will not..:deal

 

nice intellectual response....but suit yourself

 

It's beyond me what Pac and his team are doing and thinking.

But good post.

 

I know you're an idiot, Danny, but seriously - you can't prove a negative. Floyd and co need to offer some compelling reasons for why Manny is on drugs other than "he's been awfully good moving up in weight"

 

you wish?.:hey

 

/golf clap