Actions speak louder than words. Now I dont know about all this he said she said nonsense going on with Pac and Floyd? But facts are, they are both avoiding the man in the welterweight division. If Mosley beats Berto, which I think he will, I bet they still leave Mosley out. Pac if you want a real fight at 154, fight the real deal at jr middle in Sergio Martinez. Floyd, are you serious with Mathew Hatton? Facts are, if this fight falls through, Pac and Floyds actions are that of cherry picking at its finest! So I could care less who is to blame for this fight falling through. They both have a history of avoiding the best.
**** me !!!!!!! memo from me to **** for brains here : Pacquiao @ 126 - Marquez & Barrera Pacquiao @ 130 - Morales 3 times , Marquez Pacquiao @ 140 - Hatton Pacquiao @ 147 - Cotto See the pattern dumb ass , Pacquiao does not duck people !!!!!!
Too old for what, to Knockout Margo and challenge Berto. Facts are, if Mosley beats Berto, Pac or Floyd would get the most credit by fighting Shane.
Got to agree with u there if Mosley beats berto which I doubt. Both feel Mosley is too much risk when compared to the reward.
Okay, 130 and under I think everyone gives Pac credit. 135 he fights David Diaz. Instead of Casamayor who was the linear champ. 140 He fights Hatton, instead of Tim Bradley. 147 He fights Cotto, instead of Sugar Shane. 154 He wants to fight Foreman instead of S. Martinez. Cherrypicking is choosing your opponents carefully to avoid being beat. And the pattern for Pac is avoiding all the slick and powerfull boxers in each division.
You appear to be cherrypicking your facts. For example, you want Pacquiao to fight Casamayor because he is linear champion, but when he fights the linear champion at 140, you want him to fight someone else instead. I rate Bradley but all he actually has on his resume thus far is wins over Witter, Holt and Peterson. No doubt you would be able to pick that apart if Pacquiao had fought and beaten Bradley, and would be asking why he didn't face the linear champion instead. At WW you criticise Pacquaio for fighting Cotto instead of someone Cotto had beaten. Again, if it happened the other way around, you'd be making the opposite argument.
No, No, its the style of fighter. Slick, defensive boxer types. Pac has always fought the aggressive mexican style fighters who are tailor made for his style. Everyone should be able to see this pattern.
You spas, why would he fight Bradley when he stood to make about 4 times the amount facing Hatton, who was the man at 140 anyway.
Do you see he pattern? Yeah I know about the money. It's the type of fighters he has avoided, the style. Do you see Pac calling out the best 140, 147, or 154 lber today? No, because there all the wrong style for him. Bradley, Mosley, and Martinez.
If Floyd and Pac ducked each other, how could you expect either of them to fight Mosley who is believed by most to be the most dangerous among the three of them. Maybe if Shane suddenly aged and lost to Berto. Sergio's best achievement so far is a close defeat to an overrated Paul Williams, he's no better than Foreman. Matthew is perfect for Floyd as he goes for safe fights to preserve his most loved "0".
pacman will take shane. however, golden boy stated they will not allow any of their talent to fight manny. i think it's still because of the promotional dispute on pacquiao. as for floyd, it's answered already right? floyd already ducks shane during the post fight against marquez.
Casamayor was another marquee fighter on the slide if Pac fought him. Sergio is featherfisted whose best fight so far was a close defeat to an overrated Williams. Shane would be old and shot if Pac fought and beat him.:-(