The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    So if he does not want to abide by Floyd's request, then they should just sign to fight somebody else and both camps should stop jerking everybody around. I agree that he does not have to agree simply because it's not required by the NSAC. The innocent to proven guilty argument is nonsense because ALL athletes have to prove their innocence in respect to drug use. Just saying its not required is good enough.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    at this point Pac has proven his innocence with respect to drug use to the same extent that Floyd, Cotto, Marquez, Hopkins, and all other fighters have.

    He's taken and passed the same tests as they have.

    what happens in negotiations is just heresay and speculation.
     
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,494
    18,156
    Oct 7, 2006
    I'm amazed that people are actually against stricter and more detailed drug testing.
     
  4. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    :yep
    you jealous or what?
     
  5. Sean101

    Sean101 Active Member Full Member

    1,392
    1
    Oct 11, 2008
    Because its gonna be the biggest fight in boxing history, an like you said 14 days is fair as 24 so whats wrong with doing them at 14 days, then the fights done
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    I'm all for it.

    As long as all fighters are submitted to the same guidelines and the procudures cannot have a negative impact on any fighter's performance.
     
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,494
    18,156
    Oct 7, 2006
    :good

    Lets start it with Pac and Mayweather!
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    79
    May 30, 2009
    So you're for Manny agreeing to a 14 day cutoff? How do you defend that when you say what you just said?
     
  9. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Because 14 is closer to halfway then 24 from 30. Its going to be hard for *******s to defend this one without looking like morons...Oh wait, TOO LATE:lol:
     
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    The NSAC should put their testing guidelines up to date, no doubt. Wether it starts with Pac-Mayweather is not the issue when it comes to ensuring that the sport is drug-free.
     
  11. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Like I said, Pac and Mayweather should be submitted to the same testing guidelines as everyone else. The testing should be the same across the board, for all fighters not just Pac and PBF.
     
  12. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,494
    18,156
    Oct 7, 2006

    Or maybe we should word it better and say, "EVERONE should be submitted to the same testing guidelines as Pac and PBF".
     
  13. simon850

    simon850 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,007
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    With Mayweather agreeing to take the same tests, there should be no problem in the 14 day cut off.
     
  14. Ethos

    Ethos Member Full Member

    369
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    Pretty much. If you're clean and don't use any foreign substances then any fighter shouldn't be worried about more testing.
     
  15. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    Unless he thinks the tests are just a ploy that his opponent is using to weaken him.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.