Who's "0" has been more protected, Calzaghe's or PBF's?

:think

 

this can not be a serious question

 

Dodging 3 natural welterweights, fighting a smaller fighter which gives him a recent win in 2009, accusing "someone" that the fighter has using PED without a proof, and there is a chance that he will fight British boxer whom people barely know.

.....I think we already know the answer to that.

 

Calzaghe, no question. Boxing NOOBS know nothing about this sport going back more than 5 minutes.

 

too many uber noobs

 

Calzaghe easily. Everyone he fought was over there in England. Only his last 2 fights or so was he fighting legit people after they were already pretty old.

 

The correct answer is neither. Anyone has a punchers chance, its all about effort. Dont knock the undefeated fighters because none of their opponents had the balls to go all out to land a shot to hurt them.

 

i think its about the same

 

Calzaghe

 

Its close IMO

I want to say Calzaghe but he has the better career defining win than Mayweather does.

 

Calzaghe fought an ATG relatively still in his prime. Hard to fault him for that.

 

Calzaghe had a more protected 0 early and middle part of his career.

Floyd had a more protected 0 during the last part of his career.

 

floyd protected?atsch

you don't get to be a 5 divison champ in diffirent weights and be lineal if you are protectedatsch

some people need to learn boxing:-(

 

u cant even compare these twos resumes.

 

Void's is being protected. Void want's to fight Matt Hatton! What a........