Pac is fighting the guy who lost who the guy he just beat

I guess we should never listen to whatever this guy says about boxing,he's gotta look at boxrec to keep up with the true boxing fans,he should go back to the mma forums.

 

Why is floyd going to fight Paulie? Hatton beat him with ease and floyd and Pac both demolished Hatton. Then Pac destroyed Cotto who in turn beat Paulie.

It goes on and on.

But one thing for sure- would Floyd fight Clottey? doubt it very much.

 

Nah, *****, I'd say those two ******ed statements are about on par with each other.

 

not to mention the 144 catchweight. I know it wont happen against a weakened Clottey but I hope Pac gets knocked out in scary fashion, and I've never said that about another fighter before, I just think he is taking the **** now.

 

There is no point. Clottey is high risk, low reward, and Pacquiao is past those types of fights at this point.

 

why did pac fought morales? who got beat by barrera that pac destroyed....

 

" Pac is fighting the guy who lost who the guy he just beat" Brilliantly articulated question and post.

 

Maybe PBF should copy?

He could fight Juan Diaz the man beaten last by, his victim, JM Marquez

 

foreman shouldnt of fought ali cos fraizer and norton had both beat him and foreman ko'd them both in a couple of rounds!!!

 

Floyd is fighting the who lost to the guy that Pac just beat as well.

 

Clottey didnt loose to Cotto.

Clottey is the truth.

 

but demolished the guy who stopped Cotto even sooner than Pac did.

 

Some say Cotto win over Clottey is somewhat controversial, so Team Pac thought the latter is a sure tough dude to fight as he always expect for an opponent. I say Clottey is a huge fighter for Pacquiao to handle in the ring, I bet he could taste a hard time with this fellow.

 

having trouble understanding his post? I can explain it for you if you want?