The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    Manny probably should have told him to get ****ed from the beginning rather than making excuses and then publicly dangling concessions in front of everyone's face only to tell Floyd to get ****ed after all the fuss.

    There are no unified rules of boxing when it comes to testing protocols, and this isn't something that nobody has requested in the form of a contract stipulation before. The "rules" allow for additional testing to be stipulated in a contract, so nobody is trying to change any rules. If you really think about it, this isn't much different from asking a guy to agree to a catchweight, even if the blood tests would give one fighter a clear cut advantage, which I really don't think they would, especially with a 14 day cutoff, which would allow far more than enough time for any possible effects to be gone come fight night.
     
  2. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    he shouldn't have to but why did he? now let's justify pac's demand... floyd has history of not honoring the contracted weight? yes. against whom? jmm. jmm who? a 130 lbr who just fought 2 fights at 135 and was required to jump 2 weight classes! worse he didn't even atempted to sweat it out to make the contracted weight!

    Now tell me, was pac's demand not fair? :rofl:rofl
     
  3. This I agree with. And I'm glad that team pac have stipulated where they stand on these terms for future negotiations.
     
  4. EL CABALLO

    EL CABALLO Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,497
    1
    Feb 28, 2009
    SOooo, what happened there, lukeO... Your pinoy hero couldn't find the dotted line??
     
  5. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    much better than floyds using his demanded test as escape clause for the fight!
     
  6. Redcorner

    Redcorner New Member Full Member

    60
    0
    Jan 3, 2010
    So the boxing world will just tolerate any defaming accusation like that?
    If anyone lets KFC dictate the comission on what and how to sanction why have the comission?
     
  7. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    Manny: "Just not in the last couple days."

    Roach: "Five days should be fine."

    Now 14 isn't enough?! Hint: Your best defense here is to blame it all on Arum. Even some of your most loyal ******* pals have jumped ship, and the idea that Floyd is ducking this fight is out the ****ing window. :deal
     
  8. haha. just write of into the "moron" categorize anyone who says Floyd was "ducking". but it's not unusual for entourages not to be able to keep their stories straight. Arum was obviously caught spin-doctoring. but Manny wasn't at the "mediation". What I believe happened is that Manny and Roach sent Arum in with orders not to bend below 24 days. And so no agreement was reached.
     
  9. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    :rofl:rofl pac ducking? had floyd not demanded that test, you think the fight is on? A BIG YES! but what's that demand, a mandatory for the fight? A BIG NO. was pac obliged to accept it? in floyd's dream!

    so now, who's ducking?

    i cant jump to ship full of ****** minds:rofl im afraid to be called one of them!:hi:
     
  10. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    *****, you are a "****** mind".

    Yes, that demand was "a mandatory" for the fight, as evidenced by the fact that the fight is off because Manny wasn't willing to meet that demand.

    Manny was obliged to accept it to make the fight happen...In REALITY.

    Where in my post did I say "Pac ducking"?
     
  11. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    ...And while we're on the subject of "redefining the rules of boxing", it appears Pacquiao is once again demanding that his opponent come in at a catchweight for a title fight at 147. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the weightclasses have been in effect much longer than any state commission's PED testing protocol. Sorry, but that argument doesn't just work one way.
     
  12. Rooney

    Rooney Boxing Junkie banned

    7,654
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    You do realize pac and roach agreed to any testing mayweather wanted to be done. They would pass any testing, this is what they had previously said.

    Pac started to panic when he realized how random the tests would be, and from then the fight was OVER. He made excuse after excuse to get out of the fight.

    Look how quick he was to sign with clottey:rofl:rofl
     
  13. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005

    Read a ****ing book: Catchweight fights have been taking place regularly since the beginning of the sport...
     
  14. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005

    Exactly, look how quick he signed to face one of the toughest guys in the division. Mayweather has yet to face a WW of Clottey's calibre and never will... Until after Pac destroys Clottey and Mayweather decides to cherry pick whats left of him, right after shooting his hands full of Xylocaine. LOL
     
  15. Cormega

    Cormega Quadruple OG Full Member

    10,487
    6
    Oct 16, 2005
    My point was that weightclasses actually are part of the "unified" rules of boxing, and any deviation from them can be construed as changing the rules just the same as demanding stricter testing can, even if it did provide for a clear cut advantage for one guy, as catchweights often do.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.