Floyd is a ducker because arum said so...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IVLG, Dec 3, 2009.


  1. Honestly you got my intrigued with all your posturing about irrefutably. The Floyd boys were so impressed with you there for a while I was wondering if there was something I was missing. But the whole thing fell apart as soon as it was poked a little. Yeah I searched, I was waiting to be corrected.
     
  2. I dont think hardly any of the Floyd critics call him a ducker in the way you are interpreting it. Everybody saw him fight DLH. We all know he would fight Bernard Hopkins if the money was right.
     
  3. IVLG

    IVLG OBJECTIVITY IS BACK LOL Full Member

    582
    1
    Nov 24, 2009
    That's pathetic the thread must of bothered you that much, Had you thinking about it 3 days after it was written. You must really contemplate suicide. Just sad mam
     
  4. Yeah and youre the gaylord that wrote this essay length post and then acted like the messiah for Floyd huggery. Yr just sulky cause yr thread failed.
     
  5. IVLG

    IVLG OBJECTIVITY IS BACK LOL Full Member

    582
    1
    Nov 24, 2009
    I said you must contemplate suicide, and the first thing you say is "YEAH" :patsch
     
  6. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Bumped for hilarity
    This thread is a good read
     
  7. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    33
    Jan 4, 2009

    :rofl:lol::rofl:lol::rofl:lol::rofl:lol::rofl:lol::rofl:lol:

    ****in Hilarious:D
     
  8. Quarteysjab

    Quarteysjab Guest

    is floyd not a ducker because floyd, a pathological liar, says so?

    he's a coward. if he wasn't he'd take that 40 million and take his beating like a man and not worm out like a conniving *****.
     
  9. xviiixvi

    xviiixvi Active Member Full Member

    775
    0
    Jun 9, 2007
    i for one read all 19 pages and not one Floyd hater disputed the TS facts that Arum started all the ducking BS comments because he wouldnt fight Margarito. He instead fought Baldomir and made damn near 50 million in his next two or three fights. NONE of ARUMS's camp has even come close to that figure including his pride and joy Cotto and Pac.

    He just (Arum) turned down the biggest fight of the decade because of blood testing which means his last 8 years of hate becomes null and void considering he could have had his boy pac just whoop Floyd's ass. He chose to put Pac in with a nother one of his fighters so he can continue to double dip.

    Before the interview nobody here even knew who RA the Rugged was. Even doing a search on google shows me he has only had 2 albums in 7 years which means he is no more qualified to give any boxing opinion then I am. Simply saying three fighters would spank floyd's ass when two of those fighters ducked Floyd's challenge is simply assenine! The fact that he was called in to "murder" Floyd in an argument that was completely uninformed and some of you clowns bought into it gives us posters even less credibility.

    To save you the time of reading the post in its entirety, Juggernaut and Blade runner had an orgy for like 6 pages while everyone else was at work and suicide booth was holding their sacs while they pleasure each other during the "anti floyd internet climaxing" fest. Props to the TS. Floyd is a jerk, Arum is a liar and Pac is a juicehead. Forget Clottey and take dat ass whipping like a man.
     
  10. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    I guess if he made more rap albums he would be more qualified to talk about boxing :nut
    If you listened to the interview it seemes like RA knew more about boxing history than Floyd. Either way, it doesnt matter.
    As I said earlier in this thread, every boxer is in the same business as Floyd. Every other boxer is trying to make money. Yet its only Floyd who continously doesnt fight the fights he is supposed to fight
     
  11. DonPrestige

    DonPrestige Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    0
    Jun 28, 2007
    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah...........Fcking Hilarious:rofl
     
  12. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009


    So your whole argument for the against 'ducking' label is that Floyd fought for money?

    Good. Why did he retire then for almost 2 years? If he "has nothing to prove" (HIS own words) - how can that be when all his fights, according to you, was not about proving but about $$$?

    See his logic to retire and your logic it is about money does not agree with each other.

    So either PBF is a liar or you are wrong. I rather believe PBF. Which means according to him he DID fight the best challenges.

    So the argument goes back to PBF's claim that he did fight the best and his critics saying he did not.

    So- you basically wasted our time. Thank you.
     
  13. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    I admit I did laugh a bit when I read that
     
  14. IVLG

    IVLG OBJECTIVITY IS BACK LOL Full Member

    582
    1
    Nov 24, 2009
    Man either punctuate correctly, make a cohesive thought or don't even post, you sound like Simple Jack off Tropic Thunder, you must be a Pinoy because you conjugate for **** lol.