Pacman has lost credibility

Yea....Floyd/PAC is the BIG ONE. But This is Floyds best options by far. PAC didn't punk out....Floyd did. By demanding PAC do blood tests and making up rumors?! He ultimately killed the fight.

Look....Floyd has stated numerous times, as did all the other mayweathers that "PAC ain't ****"...."PAC would get whooped by lil Floyd"...."PAC cant beat my son" and that Floyd would completely outclass Manny.

All of that said before Cotto got his ass whooped....before they knew if PAC would be the next one to face Floyd jr. When PAC whooped Miguel.....Guess what.....All these rumors and accusations aimed at Manny was put on blast, setting up the "OUT" they had by demanding drug tests.

You answer me this....IF PAC ain't **** and lil Floyd has no worries about beating ANY version of Manny, why not just take the fight, 50/50. Beat Manny who may be on roids and make out with $40 mill on one of your easiest pay days ever? Where is the logic in that?

Instead Floyd watched the Cotto vs Manny fight.. ...saw Miguel get handled.....Floyd knew he was next in line....He knew it would be his biggest and most meaningful fight of his career and also his most lucrative...then turn around and **** up the fight with the accusations and demands. Floyd could beat PAC....but my man ain't as confident as he is trying to make it look and the accusations and demands only solidify that fact.

 

Clottey is no joke, are you ****ing mental or what? Clottey is a big strong Welter and gives anyone trouble at the weight. Grow up.

 

Pacquiao hasn't lost credibility, but he has certainly lost his good name. The people over at ESPN have cemented the damage.

 

Zak2 doesnt have credibility.

 

That about sums it up.

 

Fighting Marquez would be pointless, at this stage. Marquez can't fight at the high weights Pacquiao can and Pacquiao has big fights at his weight to take. Clottey's not just a pushover, he's a legitimate welterweight and has to be in the top 5. Knowing Mayweather's record and looking at Pacquiao's, I'm not in the group saying Pac ducked Mayweather. Maybe his demands were stupid, maybe it generally pissed him off, it really doesn't interest me, I'm looking forward to the fight between Pac and Clottey. I really don't expect anything decent to come from Floyd Mayweather that isn't his boxing talent these days. The fight will be made, and it's not Pac running away, if I recall he told him to sign the contract so he could kick his ass, Pac isn't the guy running away, it's the promoters and the whispers in the ear that is the problem. I guarantee it.

 

When was the last time Pac defeated an opponent by just being contented of outworking his opponent?

 

I'm sorry but another fight with Marquez would do nothing for Pacquiao. 140 or above Marquez would be put to sleep. At 135, he has a chance at beating Pacquiao, but even then I'd be scared for him...and I don't think Pacquiao has any plans of moving back to 135. So if you think the fight with Clottey made you think he's lost credibility, a 3rd Marquez fight is worse.

 

Right, so your argument is basically "Clottey is a joke because Pacquiao is too good for him". What, do you want to even the fight up, cut one of Manny's arms off? You're complaining because Pacquiao's too good? Hate to break it to you, but there's not many Welterweights in the world that can be a decent challenge to Pacquiao. Mosley was already in a fight and Mayweather's not up for it yet.

 

Then why don't you ****ing answer the question about the test?

Who introduced the test? What ****ing difference did it mean to the fight? The same Pac that so many said would get schooled and KOed yet no fight unless they agree to the test. Answer that genius boy!

 

Cmon, does your hatred for PAC cloud your judgment that much?
Clottey is not a joke. He's one of the top WW. I think PAC wins via UD but Clottey is no cakewalk.

 

The man a millionaire

 

So basically, you want him to lose? Because according to YOU, "he knows he can't beat Mayweather."