Froch/Dirrell: Another look.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Piffer, Jan 21, 2010.


  1. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    'Fairly even'? Your idea of scoring sounds very wishy-washy. You just hand the round to the champ if its 'fairly even'?
     
  2. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    Not really the champion as much as the hometown or promoter of the event fighter.
     
  3. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    I had it 115-112 Dirrell as well, and that was with me giving Froch the benefit of the doubt in every close round. I can see how many might have scored it differently, but if you give the round to the fighter who had the most clean, effective punching, it was a pretty clear Dirrell victory. If you want to penalize someone for fighting ugly, or if you let crowd noise fool you into believing that glancing blows are clean punches, then I guess you could have scored it for Froch.
     
  4. aj415

    aj415 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    6
    Aug 15, 2006
    I don't want a fighter to be unjustly rewarded. The title shouldn't change hands if it comes down to a razor thin or close fight. Scoring should favor the champion.
     
  5. eiregobrach

    eiregobrach Member Full Member

    430
    0
    Dec 17, 2008
    interesting logic, would you apply the same to future david haye fights?
     
  6. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  7. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    Thats why we have even rounds, although judges are hesistant to use them because in reality its quite rare a round would be completely even.

    What you are saying is that any rounds that is won close by either fighter goes to the champion, and any round that seems even goes to the champion. That's some funny **** man, the champ is the champ because he's supposed to be the best and to prove it, not because he needs every advantage.
     
  8. cubex

    cubex Boxing Addict banned

    7,207
    1
    Sep 12, 2009
    That's a very flawed way of scoring IMO.
     
  9. Kingslim

    Kingslim Member Full Member

    268
    0
    Mar 6, 2009
    Dirrell won, but he's definitely a *****, but carl Froch got ***** whipped.
     
  10. eiregobrach

    eiregobrach Member Full Member

    430
    0
    Dec 17, 2008


    Haye Valuev
     
  11. aj415

    aj415 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    6
    Aug 15, 2006
    I look at it like the justice system in America, Innocent until proven guilty. The challenger is the prosecution.

    And.. any close but clear rounds go to who ever won them not soley to the champion.

    EVEN rounds should go to the champion.. because judges dont score even rounds anyway!
     
  12. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    david haye broke his hand in the 3rd round

    plus he was fighting a man who weighed like 60 pounds more, he didnt play act or cheat to try and steal points

    dont get me wrong

    froch will get the knocked ****ed out by abraham and i dont really like the guy but i am so glad froch won
     
  13. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected
     
  14. aj415

    aj415 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    6
    Aug 15, 2006
    Maybe I was not clear enough.. a close but clear fight is one thing... but a could-go either way fight is what Im talking about.
     
  15. Piffer

    Piffer ****** KIT KAT Full Member

    1,603
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This content is protected